Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.
AMICUS BRIEF, CBS Corporation--[Edited 12/14/2010 by DH], FILED. Service date serviceTextdate,.,SKIP) [10-3270]
Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc. Doc. 114 10-3270-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC., COMEDY PARTNERS, COUNTRY MUSIC TELEVISION, INC., PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, GOOGLE, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIEF FOR CBS CORPORATION AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING APPELLANTS ROBERT PENCHINA LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, L.L.P. Attorneys for CBS Corporation 321 West 44th Street, Suite 510 New York, New York 10036 (212) 850-6100 Dockets.Justia.com CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Rules 26.1 and 29(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, amicus curiae, CBS Corporation, certifies that it is a publicly traded corporation and has no publicly owned parent corporation. National Amusements, Inc., a privately held company, directly owns the majority of the voting stock of CBS Corporation. DATED: December 10, 2010 LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP By_/s/Robert Penchina______ ROBERT PENCHINA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE................................................................... ARGUMENT .................................................................................................... CONCLUSION ................................................................................................. 1 2 3 i INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE Amicus curiae CBS Corporation ("CBS") respectfully submits this brief in support of appellants.1 Through its various subsidiaries and affiliated companies, CBS is engaged in the creation and production of original television and radio programming and content, gathering news and information, and broadcasting, publicly performing, publicly displaying, licensing and otherwise distributing its copyrighted programming and content. As creator and distributor of many of the nation's most popular television programs and other content, effective copyright protection is crucial to CBS. As a result, CBS has a significant interest in the important issues before this Court concerning the interpretation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq., and in particular the Digital Millennium Copyright Act provisions codified at § 512 (the "DMCA"). CBS is filing this brief because of its significant concerns with the district court's decision. CBS believes that, if not reversed by this Court, that decision threatens to impose 1 All of the parties to this appeal have consented to the submission of an amicus brief by CBS. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(c)(5) and Second Circuit Rule 29.1(b), CBS states that no counsel for a party has written this brief in whole or in part; and that no person or entity, other than CBS, has made a monetary contribution that was intended to fund the preparation or submission of this brief. substantial negative consequences for all copyright owners who are subject to mass Internet piracy of their works. ARGUMENT Amici curiae the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. ("MPAA") and the Independent Film & Television AllianceŽ (IFTAŽ) have submitted an amici curiae brief, dated as of today, which thoughtfully sets forth the reasons why the decision of the district court should be reversed. CBS adopts the arguments for reversal of the district court's decision made in IFTAŽ and MPAA's brief as though fully set forth herein, and respectfully urges that the decision of the district court be reversed. 2 CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth herein, CBS respectfully submits that the district court's judgment should be reversed. DATED: December 10, 2010 LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP By: /s/Robert Penchina ROBERT PENCHINA 321 W. 44th Street, Suite 510 New York, NY 10036 (212) 850-6100 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae CBS Corporation 3 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, FED. R. APP. P. 29 & 32 Pursuant to Rules 29 and 32 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, I certify that: 1. This brief complies with the type-volume limitation of Rule 32(a)(7)(B) because this brief contains 335 words, excluding the parts of the brief exempted by Rule 32(a)(7)(B)(iii); and 2. This brief complies with the typeface requirements of Rule 32(a)(5) and the type-style requirements of Rule 32(a)(6) because this brief has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft Word 2003 in Times New Roman, 14 point. Dated: December 10, 2010 /s/ Robert Penchina____________ ROBERT PENCHINA STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ss.: AFFIDAVIT OF CM/ECF SERVICE I, Robin M. Zuckerman, being duly sworn, depose and say that deponent is not a party to the action, is over 18 years of age. On December 10, 2010 deponent served the within: Brief for CBS Corporation as Amicus Curiae Supporting Appellants upon: SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST via the CM/ECF Case Filing System. All counsel of record in this case are registered CM/ECF users. Filing and service were performed by direction of counsel. Sworn to before me on December 10, 2010 /s/ Maryna Sapyelkina Maryna Sapyelkina Notary Public State of New York No. 01SA6177490 Qualified in Kings County Commission Expires Nov. 13, 2011 /s/ Robin M. Zuckerman Job # 233833 SERVICE LIST: Andrew H. Schapiro, Attorney Direct: 212-506-2672 Mayer Brown LLP 1675 Broadway New York, NY 10019 Paul M. Smith, Attorney Direct: 202-639-6060 Jenner & Block LLP 1099 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Matthew McGill, Attorney Direct: 202-887-3680 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Patrick Joseph Coyne, Esq., Attorney Direct: 202-408-4470 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garret & Dunner LLP 901 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 William M. Hart, Direct: 212-969-3095 Proskauer Rose LLP 1585 Broadway New York, NY 10036 Max W. Berger, Esq., Direct: 212-554-1400 Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 Louis Mark Solomon, Attorney Direct: 212-504-6000 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP 1 World Financial Center New York, NY 10281 Daniel C. Girard, Direct: 415-981-4800 Girard Gibbs LLP Suite 1400 601 California Street San Francisco, CA 94108 Kevin Michael Doherty, Direct: 615-724-3211 Burr & Forman LLP 420 North 20th Street Birmingham, AL 35203 James Edward Hough, Direct: 212-468-8158 Morrison & Foerster LLP 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10104 David S. Stellings, Direct: 212-355-9500 Lieff, Cabraser, Heinmann & Bernstein, LLP 8th Floor 250 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 Christopher Lovell, Direct: 212-608-1900 Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP Suite 501 61 Broadway New York, NY 10006 Steve D'Onofrio, Direct: 202-686-2872 Law Office of Steve D'Onofrio Suite 950 5335 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20015 Jeffrey Lowell Graubart, Attorney Direct: 626-304-2800 Law Offices of Jeffrey L. Graubart Suite 200 350 West Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, CA 91105 David H. Kramer, Attorney Direct: 650-493-9300 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Peter DeChiara, Attorney Direct: 212-563-4100 Cohen, Weiss and Simon LLP 25th Floor 330 West 42nd Street New York, NY 10036 Jeremy H. Stern Stern Digital Strategies 3009 Elm Avenue, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 310-920-2163 Clifford M. Sloan Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, L.L.P. 1440 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20005 202-371-7000 Kelly M. Klaus Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 213-683-9238