Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.

Filing 289

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS AMICUS COUNSEL, on behalf of, Intellectual Property and Internet Law Professors, FILED. Service date 04/07/2011 by CM/ECF. [256612] [10-3270]--[Edited 04/07/2011 by DH]

Download PDF
Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc. Doc. 289 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL Short Title: Viacom Int'I Inc. v. YouTube Inc.; The Football Ass'n Premier League Ltd. v. YouTube, Inc. Docket No.: 10-3270 and 10-3342 Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel's Contact Information is as follows: Name: Rebecca S. Engrav Firm: Perkins Coie LLP Address: 1201 Third Avenue, 48th Floor, Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: (206) 359-6168 E-mail: rengrav@perkinscoie.com Appearance for: Amici Curiae Intellectual Property and Internet Law Professors (party/ designation) Select One: DSubstitute counsel (replacing lead counsel: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (name/firm) DSubstitute counsel (replacing other counsel: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (name/firm) DAdditional counsel (co-counsel with: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (name/firm) ~Amicus (in support of:_D_e_f_e_n_d_a_n_ts_-_~~p~p_e_ll_e_e_s_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ Fax: (206) 359-7168 (party/ designation) CERTIFICATION I certi fy tha t: ~I am admitted to practice in this Court and, if required by Interim Local Rule 46.l(a)(2), have renewed my admission on _A...:p_r_il_7_,_2_0_1_1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OR Signature of Counsel: /s/ Rebecca S. Enqrav Type or Print Name: Rebecca S. Engrav -----~---------------------------------------------------------- Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.