Kristin Perry, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 268

Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:KKW): For purposes of clarification, these appeals are consolidated for oral argument. Treating plaintiffs’ counsel’s letter of November 17, 2010, as a motion to reconsider this Court’s Order of November 15, 2010, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The argument shall remain divided into two hour-long sessions as provided in this Court’s previously issued Order, and the allocation of time within the first hour remains the same. Time within the second hour, concerning the merits, is reallocated as follows: 30 minutes for the Proponents, 20 minutes for the Perry plaintiffs-appellees, and 10 minutes for the plaintiff-intervenor-appellee City and County of San Francisco. Until December 1, 2010, however, the Court will entertain any suggestion submitted jointly by counsel on plaintiffs’ side to reallocate the time between plaintiffs-appellees and plaintiff-intervenor-appellee, and similarly, any jointly submitted request relating to the time allocated to defendants-intervenors-appellants and movants-appellants. [7558727] [10-16696, 10-16751] (KKW)

Download PDF
K r i s t i n Perry, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al D o c . 268 F IL E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOV 26 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S K R IS T IN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, C IT Y AND COUNTY OF SAN F R A N C IS C O , Plaintiff - IntervenorA p p e lle e , v. A R N O L D SCHWARZENEGGER, in his o f f ic ia l capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, and D E N N IS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Defendants -IntervenorsA p p e lla n ts . N o . 10-16696 D .C . No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco ORDER Dockets.Justia.com KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, C IT Y AND COUNTY OF SAN F R A N C IS C O , Plaintiff-Intervenor A p p e lle e , v. A R N O L D SCHWARZENEGGER, in his o f f ic ia l capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, D E N N IS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Defendants-Intervenor, and C O U N T Y OF IMPERIAL; et al., Movants - Appellants. N o . 10-16751 D .C . No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW ORDER F o r purposes of clarification, these appeals are consolidated for oral arg u m en t. Treating plaintiffs' counsel's letter of November 17, 2010, as a motion to reconsider this Court's Order of November 15, 2010, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The argument shall remain divided into two hour-long sessions as provided in this Court's previously issued Order, and the allocation of time within the first h o u r remains the same. Time within the second hour, concerning the merits, is r ea llo c a te d as follows: 30 minutes for the Proponents, 20 minutes for the Perry p lain tiffs-ap p ellees, and 10 minutes for the plaintiff-intervenor-appellee City and C o u n ty of San Francisco. U n til December 1, 2010, however, the Court will entertain any suggestion s u b m itte d jointly by counsel on plaintiffs' side to reallocate the time between p lain tiffs-ap p ellees and plaintiff-intervenor-appellee, and similarly, any jointly su b m itted request relating to the time allocated to defendants-intervenorsap p ellan ts and movants-appellants. F O R THE COURT: M O L L Y DWYER C L E R K OF COURT B y: Kwok Wong D e p u ty Clerk