Kristin Perry, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 380

Filed (ECF) Appellee City and County of San Francisco reply to response (,motion to consolidate cases). Date of service: 11/18/2011. [7973726] (CV)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, vs. No. 10-16696 (argued Dec. 6, 2010); No. 11-16577 U.S. District Court Case No. 09-cv-02292 JW EDMUND G. BROWN JR., et al., Defendants, DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al. Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLEE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California The Honorable Chief District Judge James Ware DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney THERESE M. STEWART, State Bar #104930 Chief Deputy City Attorney CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755 MOLLIE M. LEE, State Bar #251404 Deputy City Attorneys City Hall, Room 234, One Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, California 94102-4682 Telephone: (415) 554-4708 Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CASE NO. 10-16696 n:\govli1\li2010\100617\00739454.doc Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants have moved this Court to consolidate Case Nos. 10-16696 and 11-16577. The City and County of San Francisco concurs that consolidation is appropriate on the understanding that consolidation will not delay resolution of Case No. 10-16696. Dated: November 21, 2011 Respectfully submitted, DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney THERESE M. STEWART, Chief Deputy City Attorney CHRISTINE VAN AKEN MOLLIE M. LEE Deputy City Attorneys By: / s/ Christine Van Aken CHRISTINE VAN AKEN Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CASE NO. 10-16696 n:\govli1\li2010\100617\00739454.doc 9th Circuit Case Number(s) 10-16696, 11-16577 NOTE: To secure your input, you should print the filled-in form to PDF (File > Print > PDF Printer/Creator). ********************************************************************************* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE When All Case Participants are Registered for the Appellate CM/ECF System I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system on (date) . November 21, 2011 I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. Signature (use "s/" format) s/ Martina Hassett ********************************************************************************* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE When Not All Case Participants are Registered for the Appellate CM/ECF System I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system on (date) . Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the appellate CM/ECF system. I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Signature (use "s/" format)