Dennis Hollingsworth, et al v. USDCSF, et al

Filing 8

Order filed (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, RICHARD A. PAEZ and CARLOS T. BEA) Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. [7188589] (DAF)

D e n n i s Hollingsworth, et al v. USDCSF, et al Doc. 8 F IL E D U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 08 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S D E N N IS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Petitioners, v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, K R IS T IN M. PERRY; et al., Real Parties in Interest. N o . 10-70063 D .C . No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco ORDER B efo re: SILVERMAN, PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges. P etitio n ers have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. KS/MOATT Dockets.Justia.com