ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al

Filing 183

STATEMENT of Non-Opposition to Rule 56(f) Motion filed by defendant Jan Scully. (Cassidy, Terence) Modified on 6/17/2009 (Marciel, M).

Download PDF
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al Doc. 183 1 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 3 4 5 6 7 Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 99180 Kristina M. Hall, SBN 196794 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 A tto rn e ys for Defendants JAN SCULLY, in her official capacity U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SAC RAM EN T O , C A 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL; N A T I O N A L ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA - YES ON 8, SPONSORED BY NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE, JOHN DOE #1, an individual and as representative of the CLASS OF MAJOR DONORS, Plaintiffs, vs. DEBRA BOWEN, Secretary of State for the State of California, in her official capacity; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Attorney General for the State of California, in his official capacity; DEAN C. LOGAN, Registrar-Recorder of Los Angeles County, C al i fo rn ia, in his official capacity; DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS - CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; JAN SCULLY, District Attorney for Sacramento County, California in her official capacity and as a representative of the Class of District Attorneys in the State of California; DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney for the City and County of San Francisco, California, in his official capacity and as a representative of the Class of Elected City Attorneys in the State of California; ROSS JOHNSON, TIMOTHY HODSON, EUGENE HUGUENIN, JR., ROBERT LEIDIGH and RAY REMY, members of the California Fair Political Practices Commision, in their official capacities, Defendants. / 1 C a s e No. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD D E F E N D A N T 'S STATEMENT OF NO O P P O S I T I O N TO RULE 56(f) MOTION F I L E D BY CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL DEFENDANT JAN SCULLY'S STATEMENT OF NO OPPOSITION 00692769.WPD w w w . p o r ter s c o t t . c o m Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 D e f e n d a n t JAN SCULLY hereby states that she has no opposition to the Motion of th e California Attorney General and the State Defendants herein pursuant to Federal Rule of C iv il Procedure 56(f). R e s p e c tf u lly submitted, D a te d : June 16, 2009 P O R T E R SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION By 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SAC RAM EN T O , C A 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 /s/Terence J. Cassidy Terence J. Cassidy A tto rn e y for Defendant J A N SCULLY, District Attorney for S a c ra m e n to County, California in her o f f ic ia l capacity 2 DEFENDANT JAN SCULLY'S STATEMENT OF NO OPPOSITION 00692769.WPD w w w . p o r ter s c o t t . c o m

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.