Bascom Research, LLC v. Broadvision, Inc.

Filing 80

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/23/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)

1 PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585) pandre@kramerlevin.com 2 LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404) lkobialka@kramerlevin.com 3 JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978) 4 jhannah@kramerlevin.com KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 5 990 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 6 Telephone: (650) 752-1700 Facsimile: (650) 752-1800 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC 9 Jon W. Gurka (State Bar No. 187964) jon.gurka@knobbe.com 10 Reza Mirzaie (State Bar No. 246953) reza.mirzaie@knobbe.com 11 Kendall M. Loebbaka (State Bar No. 285908) 12 kendall.loebbaka@knobbe.com KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP 13 2040 Main Street, 14th Floor Irvine, CA 92614 14 Telephone: (949) 760-0404 15 Facsimile: (949) 760-9502 16 Attorneys for Defendant BROADVISION, INC. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC, 21 22 Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 12-cv-06297-SI STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 23 BROADVISION, INC., 24 Defendant. 25 26 27 28 ____________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC (“Bascom”) and Defendant BroadVision, Inc. 2 (“BroadVision”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(a)(2) and (c), hereby stipulate for an order that: 3 1. Any and all claims of Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. 4 5 2. Defendant BroadVision, Inc.’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice, and such 6 counterclaims may only be asserted in response to a complaint asserting infringement of 7 United States Patent Nos. 7,111,232, 7,139,974 and 7,158,971 (the “asserted patents”). 8 BroadVision shall not file any declaratory judgment action concerning the asserted patents 9 unless BroadVision is accused of infringing any of the asserted patents or threatened with a 10 11 lawsuit concerning any of the asserted patents. 12 3. The parties further stipulate that, pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the parties, 13 each party agrees to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. The Clerk shall close 14 this file. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 DATED: April 22, 2013 19 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ Lisa Kobialka Lisa Kobialka Paul Andre James Hannah KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 990 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 752-1700 Facsimile: (650) 752-1800 Attorneys for Plaintiff BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC 24 25 DATED: April 22, 2013 26 27 By: /s/ Jon W. Gurka Jon W. Gurka Reza Mirzaie 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ 1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 Kendall M. Loebbaka KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: (949) 760-0404 Facsimile: (949) 760-9502 Attorneys for Defendant BROADVISION, INC. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ 2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ATTESTATION 1 2 I, Lisa Kobialka, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Stipulation for Dismissal and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby 4 attest that the concurrence of the filing of this document has been obtained from Jon W. Gurka, 5 counsel for Defendant Broadvision, Inc. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ 3 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 In consideration of the Stipulated Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC 3 (“Bascom”) and Defendant BroadVision, Inc. (“BroadVision”), the Stipulated Dismissal is 4 GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that: 5 6 7 1. Any and all claims of Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC are dismissed with prejudice. 8 2. Defendant BroadVision, Inc.’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice, and such 9 counterclaims may only be asserted in response to a complaint asserting infringement of 10 United States Patent Nos. 7,111,232, 7,139,974 and 7,158,971 (the “asserted patents”). 11 12 BroadVision shall not file any declaratory judgment action concerning the asserted patents 13 unless BroadVision is accused of infringing any of the asserted patents or threatened with a 14 lawsuit concerning any of the asserted patents. 15 16 3. The parties further stipulate that, pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the parties, each party agrees to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. 17 18 4. The Clerk shall close this file. 19 20 21 22 4/23/13 Dated: ____________________ _______________________________ THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Court Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ 4 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI AND [PROPOSED] ORDER