The American Automobile Association, Inc. v. Darba Enterprises, Inc. et al
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants have filed a combined motion, which includes both a motion for reconsideration of the Court's April 21, 2009 Order denying defendants' motion to dismiss, and motion to dismiss or transfer based on improper venue. The motion to dismiss or transfer must be re-filed as a separate motion. The motion for reconsideration is improper because defendants failed to seek leave of this Court before filing it, as required by Civil Local Rule 7-9(a). Had defendants sought leave of Court, it would have been denied because defendants have filed to show: (1) That at the time of the motion for leave, a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the Court before entry of the interlocutory order for which reconsideration is sought; . . . or (2) The emergence of new material facts or a change of law occurring after the time of such order; or (3) A manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court before such interlocutory order. See Civil Local Rule 7-9(b). Accordingly, defendants' motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The question of dismissal or transfer based on improper venue will be considered when the THE AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, INC., v. Plaintiff, No. C 09-00510 SI ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARBA ENTERPRISES INC., DARRIN BAGNUOLO, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. /
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
motion is re-filed and after briefing is completed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 6, 2009
SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.