Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 160

Minute Entry: Motion Hearing held on 8/19/2009 before Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker. PROCEEDINGS and RESULTS: The Court heard argument from counsels and ruled as follows: 1. Motion to intervene as party plaintiffs filed by the Our Family coalition, Doc #79 - denied. 2.Motion for intervention as intervenor-defendant filed by Campaign for California Families, Doc # 91 - denied. 3. Motion to intervene filed by City and County of San Francisco, Doc #109 - granted in part to allow San Francisco to present issue of alleged effect on governmental interests. 4.Trial setting and scheduling as follows:a). Designation of witnesses presenting evidence under FRE 702, 703 or 705 and production of written reports pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): October 2, 2009; b). Dispositive motions to be served and filed so as to be heard on October 14, 2009 at 10 AM; c). Completion of all discovery, except for evidence intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject matter identified by another party under FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): November 30, 2009; d). Completion of discovery on the same subject matter identified by another party under FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): December 31, 2009; see FRCP 26(a)(2)(C)(ii); e). Pretrial conference: December 16, 2009 at 10 AM; f). Trial: January 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM. 5. With respect to any disputes regarding discovery, counsel are directed to comply with Civ LR 37-1(b) and the court's standing order 1.5. 6. In the absence of the assigned judge, counsel are directed to bring any discovery disputes before Magistrate Judge Joseph C Spero. (Court Reporter Belle Ball.) (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/19/2009)

Download PDF
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 160 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document160 Filed08/19/09 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTE ORDER VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Chief Judge DATE: August 19, 2009 COURTROOM DEPUTY: Cora Klein CASE NO. C 09-2292 VRW CASE TITLE: KRISTIN PERRY et al v. ARNOLD SCHWARNEGGER et al PLAINTIFF INTERVENORS: Our Family Coalition: Shannon P Minter, Christopher Stoll, James Esseks, Elizabeth Gill, Matthew Coles, Jennifer Pizer Court Reporter: Belle Ball COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS: David Boies, Theodore B Olson Theodore Boutrous, Christopher Dusseault Theane Kapur, Enrique Monagas Jeremy Goldman, Theodore Uno Matthew D McGill PLAINTIFF INTERVENOR: City and County of San Francisco: Therese Stewart, Christine Van Aken Erin Bernstein, Dennis Herrera DEFENDANTS: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mark Horton, Linette Scott: Kenneth C Mennemeier Edmund G Brown- Attorney General of California: Gordon Burns, Tamar Pachter Patrick O'Connell - Clerk Recorder for County of Alameda: Claude Kolm, Lindsey Stern Dean C Logan - Registrar Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles: Judy Whitehurst INTERVENOR DEFENDANTS: Prop 8 Official Proponents and protectmarriage.com: Charles J Cooper David H Thompson Campaign For California Families: Rena Lindevaldsen Dockets.Justia.com Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document160 Filed08/19/09 Page2 of 2 PROCEEDINGS and RESULTS: The Court heard argument from counsels and ruled as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Motion to intervene as party plaintiffs filed by the Our Family coalition, Doc #79 denied. Motion for intervention as intervenor-defendant filed by Campaign for California Families, Doc # 91 - denied. Motion to intervene filed by City and County of San Francisco, Doc #109 - granted in part to allow San Francisco to present issue of alleged effect on governmental interests. Trial setting and scheduling as follows: a. Designation of witnesses presenting evidence under FRE 702, 703 or 705 and production of written reports pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): October 2, 2009; b. Dispositive motions to be served and filed so as to be heard on October 14, 2009 at 10 AM; c. Completion of all discovery, except for evidence intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject matter identified by another party under FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): November 30, 2009; d. Completion of discovery on the same subject matter identified by another party under FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): December 31, 2009; see FRCP 26(a)(2)(C)(ii); e. Pretrial conference: December 16, 2009 at 10 AM; f. Trial: January 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM. With respect to any disputes regarding discovery, counsel are directed to comply with Civ LR 37-1(b) and the court's standing order 1.5. In the absence of the assigned judge, counsel are directed to bring any discovery disputes before Magistrate Judge Joseph C Spero. 5. 6.