Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 265

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RULE 26 DISCLOSURES by Paul T. Katami, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Jeffrey J. Zarrillo. (Monagas, Enrique) (Filed on 11/25/2009)

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 265 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document265 Filed11/25/09 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore B. Olson, SBN 38137 tolson@gibsondunn.com Matthew D. McGill, pro hac vice Amir C. Tayrani, SBN 229609 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 955-8668, Facsimile: (202) 467-0539 Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., SBN 132009 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com Christopher D. Dusseault, SBN 177557 Ethan D. Dettmer, SBN 196046 Sarah E. Piepmeier, SBN 227094 Theane Evangelis Kapur, SBN 243570 Enrique A. Monagas, SBN 239087 333 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7804, Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies, pro hac vice dboies@bsfllp.com Theodore H. Uno, SBN 248603 333 Main Street, Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200, Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; and DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants. 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RULE 26 DISCLOSURES Dockets.Justia.com CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RULE 26 DISCLOSURES Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document265 Filed11/25/09 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred repeatedly on case management issues and submitted extensive case management statements in advance of the Court's August 19, 2009 case management conference; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2009, the Court issued an order setting November 30, 2009 as the deadline for the parties to complete discovery in this case, and, accordingly, the parties immediately began serving and responding to discovery; and WHEREAS, the parties believe that the initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 have been or will be made through the course of the expedited discovery process; and WHEREAS, given the parties' continuing efforts to complete discovery by the deadline set by the Court, the parties believe that the initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 have been or will be made through the course of the expedited discovery process. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, and ask the Court to enter an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(1) as follows: 1. No Party is required to provide initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1); 2. 3. The parties are not required to file a separate report pursuant to Rule 26(f)(2); and If the Court later determines that Rule 26 disclosures should be made or a separate Rule 26 report should be filed, the parties will meet and confer and will exchange Rule 26 disclosures and file a separate Rule 26 report within 10 days of the Court's direction. DATED: November 25, 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: and BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO 1 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RULE 26 DISCLOSURES /s/ Ethan Dettmer Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document265 Filed11/25/09 Page3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DATED: November 12, 2009 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By: /s/ Ronald Flynn Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DATED: November 10, 2009 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC By: /s/ Nicole Moss Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL DATED: November 9, 2009 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: /s/ Tamar Pachter Attorneys for Defendant ATTORNEY GENERAL EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. DATED: November 12, 2009 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP By: /s/ Kenneth C. Mennemeier Attorneys for Defendants ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARK B. HORTON, and LINETTE SCOTT (the "Administration Defendants") DATED: November 12, 2009 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL By: /s/ Manuel F. Martinez Attorneys for Defendant PATRICK O'CONNELL, Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda DATED: September 9, 2009 THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL By: /s/ Judy Whitehurst Attorneys for Defendant DEAN C. LOGAN, Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles 2 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RULE 26 DISCLOSURES Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document265 Filed11/25/09 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:_____________________ ______________________________________ HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Chief Judge 3 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RULE 26 DISCLOSURES Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document265 Filed11/25/09 Page5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document. By: /s/ Enrique A. Monagas Enrique A. Monagas 4 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RULE 26 DISCLOSURES