Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 266

STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order To Extend Time Regarding Pretrial Filings by Paul T. Katami, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Jeffrey J. Zarrillo. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Sarah E. Piepmeier)(Piepmeier, Sarah) (Filed on 11/30/2009)

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 266 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document266 Filed11/30/09 Page1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore B. Olson, SBN 38137 tolson@gibsondunn.com Matthew D. McGill, pro hac vice Amir C. Tayrani, SBN 229609 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 955-8668, Facsimile: (202) 467-0539 Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., SBN 132009 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com Christopher D. Dusseault, SBN 177557 Ethan D. Dettmer, SBN 196046 Sarah E. Piepmeier, SBN 227094 Theane Evangelis Kapur, SBN 243570 Enrique A. Monagas, SBN 239087 333 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7804, Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies, pro hac vice dboies@bsfllp.com Theodore H. Uno, SBN 248603 333 Main Street, Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200, Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; and DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants. CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW JOINT STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND TIME REGARDING PRETRIAL FILINGS 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION RE PRETRIAL FILINGS Dockets.Justia.com Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document266 Filed11/30/09 Page2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Plaintiffs Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo ("Plaintiffs"), Plaintiff-Intervenor City and County of San Francisco ("Plaintiff-Intervenor"), Defendant-Intervenors Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Hak-Shing William Tam, and Mark A. Jansson; and ProtectMarriage.com Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal ("Defendant-Intervenors"), and Defendants Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown Jr., Mark B. Horton, Linette Scott, Patrick O'Connell, and Dean C. Logan ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties"), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the following regarding the dates for filing of documents directed by the Court's August 24, 2009 Pretrial Scheduling Order (Doc #164): WHEREAS the Court entered a Pretrial Scheduling Order directing the parties to file trial memoranda, proposed findings of fact, witness lists, designations of discovery excerpts, motions in limine, and objections to anticipated evidence and testimony, and exchange exhibits "not less than ten days before the pretrial conference" scheduled for December 16, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.; WHEREAS the Pretrial Scheduling Order states that the parties shall file and serve their responses to objections to evidence and responses to motions in limine "five days before the pretrial conference"; WHEREAS certain relevant discovery will not occur until November 30, 2009, or shortly before November 30, 2009, due to the parties' ongoing discovery disputes and difficulty scheduling all depositions prior to November 30, 2009; WHEREAS the parties wish to ensure that their pretrial filings are as complete and reflect as much discovery as possible; and WHEREAS the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Northern District of California Civil Local Rules that go into effect on December 1, 2009 will compute time based on calendar days instead of court days, such that a filing deadline of not less than "five days before the [December 16] pretrial conference" would be calculated to be December 11, 2009, not December 9, 2009, which would be the deadline under the former Federal and Local Rules; // // 1 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION RE PRETRIAL FILINGS Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document266 Filed11/30/09 Page3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a), 7-12, and 16-2(e), it is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, attorneys of record for parties in the above-captioned action, as follows: 1. The parties will file trial memoranda, proposed findings of fact, witness lists, designations of discovery excerpts, motions in limine, and objections to anticipated evidence and testimony, and serve exhibits by December 7, 2009 pursuant to the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order; 2. The parties will file and serve any responses to objections to evidence and/or responses to motions in limine on December 11, 2009 pursuant to the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order and applying the December 1, 2009 modifications to the relevant Rules; 3. The parties reserve the right to supplement their pretrial filings to reflect discovery that occurs after the date of the pretrial filings, including depositions currently scheduled to occur after November 30, 2009; 4. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and facsimile signatures are deemed originals for all purposes. /// /// /// 2 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION RE PRETRIAL FILINGS Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document266 Filed11/30/09 Page4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DATED: November 30, 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: and /s/ Christopher D. Dusseault BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO DATED: November 30, 2009 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By: /s/ Ronald Flynn Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DATED: November 30, 2009 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC By: /s/ Nicole J. Moss Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL DATED: November 30, 2009 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: /s/ Tamar Pachter Attorneys for Defendant ATTORNEY GENERAL EDMUND G. BROWN JR. 3 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION RE PRETRIAL FILINGS Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document266 Filed11/30/09 Page5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DATED: November 30, 2009 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP By: /s/ Andrew W. Stroud Attorneys for Defendants ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARK B. HORTON, and LINETTE SCOTT (the "Administration Defendants") DATED: November 30, 2009 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL By: /s/ Manuel F. Martinez, Associate County Counsel Attorneys for Defendant PATRICK O'CONNELL, Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda DATED: November 30, 2009 THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL By: /s/ Judy Whitehurst Attorneys for Defendant DEAN C. LOGAN, Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:_____________________ ______________________________________ HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Chief Judge 4 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION RE PRETRIAL FILINGS Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document266 Filed11/30/09 Page6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document. By: /s/ Sarah E. Piepmeier 5 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION RE PRETRIAL FILINGS