Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 293

Statement of Designation of Discovery Excerpts by Martin F. Gutierrez, Dennis Hollingsworth, Mark A. Jansson, Gail J. Knight, ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal, Hak-Shing William Tam. (Cooper, Charles) (Filed on 12/7/2009)

Download PDF
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 293 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document293 Filed12/07/09 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC Charles J. Cooper (DC Bar No. 248070)* ccooper@cooperkirk.com David H. Thompson (DC Bar No. 450503)* dthompson@cooperkirk.com Howard C. Nielson, Jr. (DC Bar No. 473018)* hnielson@cooperkirk.com Nicole J. Moss (DC Bar No. 472424)* nmoss@cooperkirk.com Peter A. Patterson (OH Bar No. 0080840)* ppatterson@cooperkirk.com 1523 New Hampshire Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 220-9600, Facsimile: (202) 220-9601 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW P. PUGNO Andrew P. Pugno (CA Bar No. 206587) andrew@pugnolaw.com 101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100, Folsom, California 95630 Telephone: (916) 608-3065, Facsimile: (916) 608-3066 ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND Brian W. Raum (NY Bar No. 2856102)* braum@telladf.org James A. Campbell (OH Bar No. 0081501)* jcampbell@telladf.org 15100 North 90th Street, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 Telephone: (480) 444-0020, Facsimile: (480) 444-0028 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A. JANSSON, and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL * Admitted pro hac vice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' DESIGNATION OF DISCOVERY EXCERPTS Pretrial Conference Date: December 16, 2009 Time: 10:00 a.m. Judge: Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker Location: Courtroom 6, 17th Floor Trial Date: January 11, 2010 DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' DESIGNATION OF DISCOVERY EXCERPTS CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Dockets.Justia.com Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document293 Filed12/07/09 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; and DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, and PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, and MARK A. JANSSON; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, Defendant-Intervenors. Additional Counsel for Defendant-Intervenors ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND Timothy Chandler (CA Bar No. 234325) tchandler@telladf.org 101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100, Folsom, California 95630 Telephone: (916) 932-2850, Facsimile: (916) 932-2851 Jordan W. Lorence (DC Bar No. 385022)* jlorence@telladf.org Austin R. Nimocks (TX Bar No. 24002695)* animocks@telladf.org 801 G Street NW, Suite 509, Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 393-8690, Facsimile: (202) 347-3622 * Admitted pro hac vice DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' DESIGNATION OF DISCOVERY EXCERPTS CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document293 Filed12/07/09 Page3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order, Doc # 164, Defendant-Intervenors ("Proponents") respectfully submit this statement identifying (1) deposition testimony and (2) interrogatory answers and requests for admission that may be used as part of their direct case. Proponents may also rely upon deposition testimony and/or interrogatory answers and requests for admission designated by other parties to this case. I. Deposition Testimony1 Witness Chauncey Designations 4:2-4:8; 15:1-15:13; 16:5-19:13; 20:25-24:8; 32:10-33:17; 34:2-34:17; 36:1-36:23; 37:8-37:25; 39:4-39:24; 44:1-50:24; 51:20-52:4; 52:2355:4; 57:24-67:1; 68:6-69:5; 74:18-75:20; 78:6-79:3; 82:25-83:10; 104:23-105:11; 108:11-109:20; 110:25-111:4; 112:14-113:5; 115:17116:11; 123:5-123:10; 127:5-127:17; 137:14-137:22; 138:3-138:10; 140:25-141:8; 142:19-144:20; 148:9-148:17; 157:5-157:24; 166:6166:18; 168:14-169:19; 174:1-174:13; 177:3-178:1; 179:16-179:20 Cott 5:1-5:10; 23:5-23:15; 28:11-32:15; 34:19-36:20; 65:19-90:24; 145:6146:8; 151:15-151:23; 162:24-163:25; 166:20-167:2; 167:19-170:4; 174:1-176:20; 181:25-182:9; 184:21-185:18; 205:19-207:16; 213:19215:4; 226:24-228:16 Egan 7:4-7:13; 10:22-12:14; 19:4-20:8; 29:24-30:17; 32:16-33:6, 39:1740:10; 74:6-74:14; 180:18-181:17; 181:21-182:8; 185:20-186:12; 205:24-207:4; 218:6-219:10; 220:14-220:21; 224:22-225:21; 226:9226:21 Hamermesh 6:4-6:6; 11:14-12:7; 12:18-12:21; 13:1-13:11; 41:16-42:5; 58:23-60:9; 68:22-69:14; 76:16-77:25; 79:17-80:2; 85:16-86:1; 98:19-99:9; 99:1599:20; 126:14-126:24; 136:22-137:21; 140:7-140:15; 141:7-141:18; 143:8-143:21; 144-22-145:5; 145:14-145:24; 161:6-162:4; 164:22165:10; 174:3-174:16; 175:22-176:4; 182:6-182:18; 183:11-185:2; 193:3-193:13 Lamb 6:11-6:21; 97:6-98:13; 99:4-99:18; 187:4-187:12; 187:20-189:9 Meyer 5:1-4; 39:15-22; 49:10-19; 50:2-15; 51:20-25; 52:1-13; 64:5-15; 74:717; 77:19-25; 76:2-23; 85:5-11; 85:17-25; 86:2-3; 108:12-23; 124:3-24; 125:2-14; 130:7-25; 131:2-7; 160:14-25; 161:2-25; 162:2-13; 164:2-25; 165:2-10; 166:13-25; 167:2-25; 168:2-5; 173:24-25; 174:2-14; 187:425; 188:2-25; 189:2-13; 190:2-25; 191:2-25; 192:2-25; 193:2-25; 194:2-17 Peplau 5:4-5:6; 8:25-11:15; 44:9-46:4; 121:5-125:22;190:23-192:5; 199:15200:5; 223:6-225:9 Perry 6:1-6:6; 7:3-7:4; 14:10-14:21; 16:11-17:1; 17:18-18:17; 19:1-20:17; 20:21-21:6; 23:1-23:22; 24:6-25:7; 26:4-26:12; 27:17-27:24; 28:2229:5; 29:13-29:16; 31:6-31:12; 31:18-31:20; 32:14-32:18; 32:23-33:2; 33:13-33:14; 37:10-37:18; 38:6-38:15; 40:18-41:2; 41:11-43:6; 53:1053:22; 54:7-55:8; 69:15-72-14; 75:1-71:22; 76:1-76:8; 87:22-88:10; 110:7-111:3; 117:17-118-8; 120:5-120:12; 124:13-125:8; 134:15135:5; 136:22-137:23; 140:6-140:18; 141:7-141:19; 145:3-147:2; Proponents reserve the right to designate testimony for use as part of their direct case at trial from the depositions of M.V. Lee Badgett, Letitia Anne Peplau, and any other deposition that has yet to take place once the final transcript of those depositions is available to them. 1 DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' DESIGNATION OF DISCOVERY EXCERPTS CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW 1 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document293 Filed12/07/09 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 II. Segura Stier 147:25-148:9; 151:16-152:24 5:3-5:5; 32:1-34:3; 36:9-37:10; 38:23-40:22; 102:2-102:14; 115:7115:12; 116:16-116:23; 125:7-126:21; 130:25-137:10; 141:14-142:11; 142:17-143:19; 172:14-176:18; 178:11-181:6; 186:13-191:4; 194:22195:24; 206:19-207:12; 235:22-236:22; 270:12-272:14; 272:16-273:16 6:4-6:6; 12:23-13:1; 18:14-19:2; 19:13-20:8; 20:19-20:25; 21:2522:22; 23:2-24:11; 24:20-27:4; 27:16-28:17; 29:11-29:22; 33:2-33:17; 34:18-35:1; 35:13-36:21; 37:12-37:15; 37:21-38:6; 40:9-40:14; 42:242:11; 43:5-43:6; 45:3-46:19; 57:6-57:14; 61:10-61:18; 62:17-63:5; 68:10-69:18; 70:5-70:16; 71:24-73:18; 90:5-90:24; 94:18-96:6; 96:1896:21; 98:24-99:12; 101:8-101:15; 121:3-121:10; 128:19-128:24; 129:15-130:1; 132:9-132:19; 143:1-143:11; 166:8-166:24; 169:7169:22; 172:21-172:25; 175:11-175:24; 176:9-176:17; 179:8-179:25; 180:5-180:21; 186:21-188:2; 190:3-190:25; 192:11-192:18; 192:23193:8; 193:13-193:25; 195:15-196:1; 196:23-197:7; 197:17-198:13; 198:24-199:7; 199:11-199:25; 200:24-202:8; 203:15-204:16 Interrogatory Answers and Requests for Admission 1. Attorney General's Response to Plaintiffs' Request for Admission No. 42, September 23, 2009 2. Attorney General's Response to Plaintiffs' Request for Admission No. 48, September 23, 2009 3. Attorney General's Response to Plaintiffs' Request for Admission No. 50, September 23, 2009 4. Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant-Intervenors Proposition 8 Proponents' Interrogatory No. 16, September 16, 2009 5. Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant-Intervenors Proposition 8 Proponents' Request for Admission No. 22, September 16, 2009 6. Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant-Intervenors Proposition 8 Proponents' Request for Admission No. 50, September 16, 2009 7. Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant-Intervenors Proposition 8 Proponents' Request for Admission No. 134, September 16, 2009 8. The Administration Defendants' Response to Plaintiff-Intervenor City and County of San Francisco's Interrogatory No. 3, December 4, 2009 Dated: December 7, 2009 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A. JANSSON, AND PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM 2 DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' DESIGNATION OF DISCOVERY EXCERPTS CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document293 Filed12/07/09 Page5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL By: /s/Charles J. Cooper Charles J. Cooper 3 DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' DESIGNATION OF DISCOVERY EXCERPTS CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW