Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 501

Minute Entry: Motion Hearing held on 1/20/2010 before Joseph C. Spero re 404 MOTION to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed by James L Garlow, and 407 MOTION to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed by Miles McPherson. Motions DENIED. Court to prepare Order. (Court Reporter Jim Yeomans.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/20/2010)

Download PDF
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 501 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document501 Filed01/20/10 Page1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED CIVIL MINUTE ORDER CASE NO. C 09-02292 VRW (JCS) CASE NAME: KRISTIN M. PERRY v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO DATE: Jan. 20, 2010 TIME: 32 M COURTROOM DEPUTY: Karen Hom COURT REPORTER: Jim Yeomans COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: Vincent McCarthy -non-party witnesses Miles McPherson & James Garlow COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Matthew D. McGill - Plas Josh Hiller PROCEEDINGS: 1. James L. Garlow's Motion to Quash, and for Protective Order [Docket No. 404] RULING: Denied 2. Miles McPherson's Motion to Quash, and for Protective Denied Order [Docket No. 407] _________________________________________________________________________ ORDERED AFTER HEARING: __________________________________________________________________________ ORDER TO BE PREPARED BY: () Plaintiff () Defendant (X) Court CASE CONTINUED TO: ___________________________________________________________________________ Number of Depos: Expert Disclosure: Motions Hearing: Number of Experts: Expert Rebuttal: at 9:30 a.m. Discovery Cutoff: Expert Discovery Cutoff: Pretrial Conference: at 1:30 p.m. Trial Date: cc: Chambers; Karen * (T) = Telephonic Appearance at 8:30 a.m. ()Jury ()Court Set for days __________________________________________________________________________________________ *Amended to correct clerical typing error from Plaintiff to Dft-Intervener Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.