Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 547

Declaration of JAMES CARROLL in Support of 546 Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant-Intervenors' Motion to Compel Compliance With Non-Party Document Subpoenas filed byEquality California. (Related document(s) 546 ) (Whittemore, Lauren) (Filed on 2/2/2010)

Download PDF
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 547 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document547 Filed02/02/10 Page1 of 3 2 ") oJ 4 5 6 7 LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB NO. 054283) lpasahow@fenwick.com CAROLYN CHANG (CSB O. 217933) cchang@fenwick.com LESLIE KRAMER (CSB 0 . 2 5 3 3 1 3 ) Ikramer Jenwick.com LAUREN WHITTEMORE (C B 0 . 2 5 5 4 3 2 ) Iwhittemorc@fcnwick.coll1 FE WICK & WE T LLP 555 California Street, Suite 1200 an Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 Attorneys for Third-Party Equality California ITED TAT S DISTRICT CO RT NORTH RN 01 TRICT OF C L1FOR lA AN FRAN IS O D I Y I 1 0 KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY 1. ZARRlLLO, Plaintiffs, v. 8 9 10 11 12 ...J ...J a.. Case o. 09-CV-2292 YRW ~ "" UJ Vl 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 olj . L w" ' .. ARNOLD SCHWARZE EG ER, in his official capacity as Governor o f alifornia; DMUND G. BROWN, JR., in hi official capa i t y a Attorney G e n e r a l o f alifornia; MARK B. HORTON, in hi official capacity as Director o f the California Department o f Public Health and State Registrar o f Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director o f Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department o f Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity a Clerk-Recorder for the County o f Alameda; and DEA . LOG , in hi official capacity as Registrar-Record ,-ICounty lerk for the County o f Los Angeles Defendant, and P R O P O S I T I O N 8 O F F I C I A L PROPONENTS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL 1. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, HAK- HING ON; and WILLIAM TAM, and MARK A. J A PROTECTMARRI GE. OM - YE ON 8, A PROlE T O F C L l F O R N I A R E N - W A L , Defendant -Intervenors. D E C L . O F J A M E S C A R R O L L IN UPP. O F E Q C A ' S OPP. T O D E F . - [ N T E R V E N O R ' MTN. T O C O M P E L COMPo WITH DOC. S U B P O E N A S D E C L A R A T I O N OF J A M E S C A R R O L L IN SUPPORT OF T H I R D - P A R T Y EQUALITY C A L I F O R l A ' S OPPOSITIO TO DEFE D A N T - I N T E R V E O R S ' MOTION T O COMPEL C O M P L I A CE WITH NON-PARTY DOC M E N T S U B P O E N A S Trial: January 1 1 , 2 0 1 0 Judge: C h i e f Judge Vaughn R. Walker Location: Courtroom 6 17th Floor C A S E NO. 09-CV-2292 VR W Dockets.Justia.com Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document547 Filed02/02/10 Page2 of 3 L Jam ]. -. j Brian arro]!. d e c l a r e a f o l l o w : a l i f o r n i a C" Q C "). I hav p e r onal I am M a n a g i n g D i r e c t o r o f Equalit k n o w l e d g e o f the m a t t e r e t forth her in unles oth rwi e s t a t e d and i f c a l l e d u p o n , c o u l d a n d 4 5 6 7 8 w o u l d te t i f y c o m p e t e n t l y t h e r e t o . 2. 3. EQCA i a California non-profit organization. E Q C A p a r t i c i p a t e d in t h e 0 o n 8 - E q u a l i t y F o r All c a m p a i g n a o n e o f i x t 15 Q m p l o e e w o r k e d o n th 0 rganizati n . D u r i n g th campaign, including m m e m b e r o f the E x e c u t i e 4. ampaign approximatel e l f and ' cuti e D i r e c t o r 0 on 8 o f f K o r . G e o f f K o r a l s o e r ed a a q u a l i t y F o r All c a m p a i g n . 9 10 o m m i t t e e o f the on 8 - E Q C A ' s i n v o l v e m e n t in t h e e f f o r t to d e f e a t P r o p o i t i o n 8 b e g a n in e a r l y 2 0 0 8 II 12 c.. w h e n the o r g a n i z a t i o n a i d e d in t h e e f f o r t to p r e v e n t P r o p o i t i o n 8 f r o m q u a l i f y i n g f o r t h e ballot. 5. I ha e 0 e r 1 4 , 0 0 0 a ed e m a i l m 0 a g e d u r i n g th p e r i o d Q employee 011 .:; u '" ~ :;; 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 were w o r k i n g o n the on 8 - E q u a l i t y o r II a m p a i g n . I h a d sa l e d ev r a l o r m y ague who '" ?: w o r k e d o n th c a n l p a i g n h w m a n e m a i l m e a g e ' t h d d u r i n g the c a m p a i g n . O n e u. .z, . c o l l e a g u e had o v e r 13 0 0 0 m s a g e a n d 1 s t i m a t e t h a t G e o f f K o r h a o v e r 3 0 0 0 0 e m a i l m e s a g e s f r o m t h a t t i m e p riod. 6. 1n o r d e r to A l t h o u g h E Q C A ' s e m a i l is s t o r e d on a c e n t r a l s e r v e r , t h e e r v e r is n o t s a r c h a b l e . a r c h t h e t o r d mai I Q J11 m p l o y e e m u t ign o n i n d i v i d u a l l a n d p e r f o r m t h e elve . a r c h for a n d c o l l e c t i o n o f p u b l i c d o c u m e n t s earch o f th ir t o r e d e m a i l Illes ag s th 7. In o v e m b e r o f 2 0 0 8 , l o v e r a w the for p u r p o s e o f r s p o n d i n g to P r o p o n n t s s u b p o e n a . A s p a r t o f t h a t e f f o r t p a r t i c u l a r E Q A e m p l o y e e s i n c l u d i n g m y s e l f , h a d to e a r c h for and c o l l e c t e m a i l di t r i b u t e d to t h e public. 23 24 25 26 II II II II II II D 27 28 Q A' L. OF l A M E C A R R O L L I UPP. OF P P . T D - F . - I T - R V E OR ' M T . T O O M P E L COMPo W I T H D BPO C A E N O . 09-CY-2292 V R W Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document547 Filed02/02/10 Page3 of 3 8. I 11\:1 i~\ ~ th~ ti m e a n J \.' I r n r l it \"'oull! take to requ~st~d rl'-s~arc h LVl". \ i ndi \ ' i d u a k \.'l11ail 10 ::: .., .J for the pri\'utc c o m m u n i c a t i o n s no\v being by P r o p o n e n t s in o r d e r to pl"ll\ic1e thelll our counsel would cause serious disruption to E Q C / \ , ~ :" 6 7 ~ true and l"llIT\.'CI. E,\C'CUll'd this 2nd da:- o f February. ::W 1O. in San Francisco. California, 9 10 11 "" (b-..~ .lames C a r r o l l . 12 0- :- .; f " 13 ; .:t, -~ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 -,-, -",' 2~ 25 26 ~7 2~ D E C I . OF . I A M I : S C A R R O L L I N S U p p OF J : l ) l X S U P I ' TO I l I Y I N I I I { \'L~()I{S M I N. 1 0 C()~vll)I:L curV1p, \ \ 1'111 DOC "1 i l W t l ! " A S 2 CASI,. NO. 1Il)-l"V-':':9.":' V R W

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.