Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 589

ORDER. Signed by Judge Spero on February 11, 2010. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER, PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as governor of California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in his official capacity as attorney general of California; MARK B HORTON, in his official capacity as director of the California Department of Public Health and state registrar of vital statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as deputy director of health information & strategic planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ, HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Defendant-Intervenors. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No C 09-2292 VRW ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Both Equality California and No on Proposition 8, Campaign for Marriage Equality, A Project of the American Civil Liberties Union (the "ACLU") shall, separately and not later than February 22, 2010, serve and file a declaration identifying the core group of individuals "engaged in the formulation of campaign strategy and messaging." Perry v Hollingsworth, -- F3d --, No 09Each 17241 Slip op at 36 n 12 (9th Cir January 4, 2010). organization's declaration shall identify only those individuals who were involved in that organization's campaign; the declarations should not include individuals or entities from other organizations. Equality California, the ACLU, Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights and the proponents should be prepared to discuss the scope of the non-parties' First Amendment privilege at the hearing scheduled for February 25, 2010 at 2:30 PM. IT IS SO ORDERED. JOSEPH C SPERO United States Magistrate Judge 2