Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 615

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME and [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION by ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Equality California, ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal. (Whittemore, Lauren) (Filed on 3/11/2010) Modified on 3/12/2010 (far, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document615 Filed03/11/10 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB NO. 054283) lpasahow@fenwick.com CAROLYN CHANG (CSB NO. 217933) cchang@fenwick.com LESLIE KRAMER (CSB NO. 253313) lkramer@fenwick.com LAUREN WHITTEMORE (CSB NO. 255432) lwhittemore@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 Attorneys for Third-Party Equality California (Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, and PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME Trial: January 11, 2010 Judge: Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker Location: Courtroom 6, 17th Floor 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document615 Filed03/11/10 Page2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O On March 5, 2010, Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero granted, to the extent specified in a written opinion (Doc # 610), the motion of Defendants-Intervenors ("Proponents") to compel Equality California and No on Proposition 8, Campaign for Marriage Equality, A Project of the American Civil Liberties Union ("ACLU") (collectively "Objectors") to produce certain documents on a rolling basis with production to be competed by March 31st. Proponents did not agree to Objectors' request for a stay of the Order, but Proponents and Objectors have agreed to an expedited schedule for the filing and briefing of objections which both sides intend to file to that Order. See Declaration of Lauren Whittemore in Support of Stipulated Request to Shorten Time ("Whittemore Dec."). Pursuant to that agreed-upon schedule, Objectors have today filed their objections. Proponents have agreed to file their opposition to those objections as well as their own objections to Magistrate Judge Spero's Order on March 15 and Objectors will file any opposition to Proponents' objections on March 17. Whittemore Dec. at 2, 3. In the event the Court grants Objectors' Motion for Administrative Relief and sets a hearing date of March 16, Objectors conditionally waive the right to oppose Proponents' objections to the Order. Objectors retain the right to file an opposition to Proponents' objections at a later time. Proponents have agreed to Objectors' request for a hearing date of March 16 or March 23. Whittemore Dec. at 8. // // // // // // // // // // STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document615 Filed03/11/10 Page3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O Wherefore, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2, Objectors request that the Court approve the schedule proposed above. Dated: March 11, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ Lauren Whittemore Lauren Whittemore Attorneys for Third Party, Equality California Dated: March 11, 2010 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP By: /s/ Stephen Bomse Stephen Bomse 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME STEPHEN V. BOMSE JUSTIN M. ARAGON Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP ALAN L. SCHLOSSER ELIZABETH O. GILL ACLU Foundation Of Northern California Attorneys for No on Proposition 8, Campaign for Marriage Equality: A Project of the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California Dated: March 11, 2010 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC By: /s/ Jesse Panuccio Jesse Panuccio ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTSINTERVENORS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, MARK A. JANSSON, AND PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL 2 CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document615 Filed03/11/10 Page4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: __________________ ________________________________________ VAUGHN R. WALKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Attestation Pursuant to General Order 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B., I, Lauren Whittemore, hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from each of the other signatories to this document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 11, 2010 at San Francisco, California. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 11, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ Lauren Whittemore Lauren Whittemore Attorneys for Third-Party, Equality California STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME 3 CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW