Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 634

ORDER DIRECTING the parties and nonparties to inform the court in writing not later than April 22, 2010 whether they have resolved outstanding discovery issues; DISCHARGING Doc #631. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER, PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as governor of California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in his official capacity as attorney general of California; MARK B HORTON, in his official capacity as director of the California Department of Public Health and state registrar of vital statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as deputy director of health information & strategic planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ, HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Defendant-Intervenors. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No C 09-2292 VRW ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties and nonparties appear to be in substantial agreement with respect to the outstanding discovery issues. Doc #633-6 at 2; Doc #633-7 at 1-2; Doc #633-10 at 2. See Accordingly, the court finds it appropriate to allow the parties and nonparties until April 22, 2010 to confer and negotiate in order to reach a stipulation that will resolve remaining discovery issues. In the event the parties and nonparties are unable to reach a resolution of these issues, they are DIRECTED to inform the court in writing, either jointly or separately, not later than 5 PM PDT on April 22, 2010. Good cause having been shown, see Doc #632 at 7, the order to show cause why the evidentiary record should not be closed, Doc #631, is hereby DISCHARGED. IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge 2