Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 644

ORDER of USCA (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2010)

Download PDF
Case: 10-15649 03/31/2010 Page: 1 of 2 ID: 7284168 DktEntry: 9 F IL E D U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAR 31 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S K R IS T IN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, and C IT Y AND COUNTY OF SAN F R A N C IS C O , Intervenor - Plaintiff, v. A R N O L D SCHWARZENEGGER, in his o f f ic ia l capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, and D E N N IS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Intervenor - Defendants Appellees, N o . 10-15649 D .C . No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco ORDER E Q U A L IT Y CALIFORNIA and NO ON P R O P O S IT IO N 8, CAMPAIGN FOR M A R R IA G E EQUALITY, A PROJECT O F THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES U N IO N OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AT/MOATT Case: 10-15649 03/31/2010 Page: 2 of 2 ID: 7284168 DktEntry: 9 Third parties - Appellants, and C A L IF O R N IA N S AGAINST E L IM IN A T IN G BASIC RIGHTS, Third party. B efo re: WARDLAW, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. No later than April 9, 2010, the parties shall file simultaneous briefs a d d r e ss in g solely the issues of whether this court has jurisdiction over this appeal an d whether mandamus is appropriate. See Vizcaino v. U.S. Dist. Court, 173 F.3d 7 1 3 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding that this court may exercise mandamus jurisdiction w h en a district court does not comply with the mandate); In re Subpoena Served on C a l. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 813 F.2d 1473, 1476 (9th Cir. 1987) (holding that a n o n p a rty ordinarily can obtain review of a discovery order by defying the order a n d appealing the ensuing contempt citation). B r ie fin g on the remaining issues in this appeal is suspended pending further co u rt order. AT/MOATT 2 1 0 -1 5 6 4 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.