Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 644

ORDER of USCA (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2010)

Case: 10-15649 03/31/2010 Page: 1 of 2 ID: 7284168 DktEntry: 9 F IL E D U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAR 31 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S K R IS T IN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, and C IT Y AND COUNTY OF SAN F R A N C IS C O , Intervenor - Plaintiff, v. A R N O L D SCHWARZENEGGER, in his o f f ic ia l capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, and D E N N IS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Intervenor - Defendants Appellees, N o . 10-15649 D .C . No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco ORDER E Q U A L IT Y CALIFORNIA and NO ON P R O P O S IT IO N 8, CAMPAIGN FOR M A R R IA G E EQUALITY, A PROJECT O F THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES U N IO N OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AT/MOATT Case: 10-15649 03/31/2010 Page: 2 of 2 ID: 7284168 DktEntry: 9 Third parties - Appellants, and C A L IF O R N IA N S AGAINST E L IM IN A T IN G BASIC RIGHTS, Third party. B efo re: WARDLAW, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. No later than April 9, 2010, the parties shall file simultaneous briefs a d d r e ss in g solely the issues of whether this court has jurisdiction over this appeal an d whether mandamus is appropriate. See Vizcaino v. U.S. Dist. Court, 173 F.3d 7 1 3 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding that this court may exercise mandamus jurisdiction w h en a district court does not comply with the mandate); In re Subpoena Served on C a l. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 813 F.2d 1473, 1476 (9th Cir. 1987) (holding that a n o n p a rty ordinarily can obtain review of a discovery order by defying the order a n d appealing the ensuing contempt citation). B r ie fin g on the remaining issues in this appeal is suspended pending further co u rt order. AT/MOATT 2 1 0 -1 5 6 4 9