Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 650

Minute Entry: Show Cause Hearing. 1.Plaintiffs and proponents shall inform the court not later than April 30, 2010 at noon PDT whether the No on 8 groups' production is in compliance with the court's March 5 and March 22 orders (Doc ##610, 623). 2. If plaintiffs and proponents inform the court that the No on 8 groups' production is not in compliance, the court will hold a further hearing on the contempt OSC, Doc #641, on May 3, 2010 at 10 AM PDT. 3. If the No on 8 groups' production complies with the court's March 5 and March 22 orders, proponents shall serve and file any supplement to the evidentiary record not later than May 5, 2010 at 5 PM PDT. Plaintiffs shall respond to proponents' submission not later than May 7, 2010 at 5 PM PDT, and proponents shall file any reply not later than May 12, 2010 at 5 PM PDT. At that time the evidentiary record shall be submitted and upon the court's rulings shall be closed. 4. Proponents' and Dr Tam's motions for leave to file motions for reconsideration, Doc ##640, 642, are GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall serve and file their opposition to the motions for reconsideration on or before May 6, 2010 at noon PDT, and proponents and Dr Tam may serve and file a reply on or before May 10, 2010 at noon PDT. 5. The court proposes closing arguments be held June 16, 2010 at 10 AM. The parties are to inform the court clerk promptly if that date is not agreeable. (Court Reporter Joan Columbini.) (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 4/28/2010)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTE ORDER VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Chief Judge Date: April 28, 2010 Courtroom Deputy : Cora Klein Case No. C 09-2292 VRW Title: KRISTIN PERRY, et al v. ARNOLD SCHWARNEGGER, et al Counsel For Plaintiffs: Christopher Dusseault, Enrique Monagas City and County of San Francisco Ronald Flynn, Mollie Lee Non Party: ACLU: Stephen Bomse, Elizabeth Gill Equality California Lynn Pasahow, Leslie Kramer PROCEEDINGS: 1. Plaintiffs and proponents shall inform the court not later than April 30, 2010 at noon PDT whether the No on 8 groups' production is in compliance with the court's March 5 and March 22 orders (Doc ##610, 623). If plaintiffs and proponents inform the court that the No on 8 groups' production is not in compliance, the court will hold a further hearing on the contempt OSC, Doc #641, on May 3, 2010 at 10 AM PDT If the No on 8 groups' production complies with the court's March 5 and March 22 orders, proponents shall serve and file any supplement to the evidentiary record not later than May 5, 2010 at 5 PM PDT. Plaintiffs shall respond to proponents' submission not later than May 7, 2010 at 5 PM PDT, and proponents shall file any reply not later than May 12, 2010 at 5 PM PDT. At that time the evidentiary record shall be submitted and upon the court's rulings shall be closed. Court Reporter: Joan Columbini Defendant Intervenors Prop 8 et al: Jesse Panuccio For The Governor: Andrew Stroud by telephone Office of the Attorney General Tamar Pachter 2. 3. 4. Proponents' and Dr Tam's motions for leave to file motions for reconsideration, Doc ##640, 642, are GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall serve and file their opposition to the motions for reconsideration on or before May 6, 2010 at noon PDT, and proponents and Dr Tam may serve and file a reply on or before May 10, 2010 at noon PDT. The court proposes closing arguments be held June 16, 2010 at 10 AM. The parties are to inform the court clerk promptly if that date is not agreeable. 5.