Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 795

ORDER by Judge James Ware granting 792 Motion for Leave to File (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2011)

Download PDF
7 8 9 R NIA S FO LI ER H 6 Judge Ja RT 5 re mes Wa NO 4 D RDERE OO IT IS S A 3 UNIT ED 2 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP David M. Balabanian (SBN 37368) david.balabanian@bingham.com Frank Busch (SBN 258288) frank.busch@bingham.com Elizabeth Benson (SBN 268851) elly.benson@bingham.com Kathryn Conard (SBN 275094) kate.conard@bingham.com Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 1.415.393.2000 Facsimile: 1.415.393.2286 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C Attorneys for Amicus Curiae The Bar Association of San Francisco 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Intervenor, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Case No. 09-CV-2292 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO Date: Time: Judge: Location: June 13, 2011 9:00 a.m. Chief Judge Ware Courtroom 5, 17th Floor Defendants, and PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 09-CV-2292 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER Good cause appearing, the motion of The Bar Association of San Francisco for leave to file a brief of amicus curiae is hereby GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 _______________________________ Hon. James Ware United States Chief District Judge Dated: __________, 2011 May 31 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 09-CV-2292 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.