Gallion v. Apple, Inc

Filing 21

STIPULATION re 20 MOTION to Relate Case ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED by Apple, Inc. (Muhlbach, Andrew) (Filed on 8/6/2010)

Gallion v. Apple, Inc Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) PPreovolos@mofo.com ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694) AMuhlbach@mofo.com HEATHER A. MOSER (CA SBN 212686) HMoser@mofo.com SAMUEL J. BOONE LUNIER (CA SBN 252732) slunier@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CHARLENE GALLION, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CV 10-01610-RS CLASS ACTION STIPULATION RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED [L.R. 3-12, 7-11] Judge Richard Seeborg, Courtroom 3 Complaint Filed: April 15, 2010 Trial Date: None Set STIPULATION RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CV 10-01610-RS sf-2879415 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the action Christopher Corsi v. Apple Inc. et al., Northern District of California, San Jose Division, Case No. CV 10-03316 PVT ("Corsi") was filed on July 28, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Corsi action asserts claims against defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") that are substantially similar to the claims asserted in Charlene Gallion v. Apple Inc., Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Case No. CV 10-01610-RS ("Gallion"); and WHEREAS, the putative classes in both the Corsi and Gallion actions substantially overlap; and WHEREAS, the parties believe that the Corsi action involves substantially similar questions of law and fact1 as the Gallion action; and WHEREAS, the parties believe the Corsi action is a "related case" within the meaning of Local Rule 3-12; and WHEREAS, the parties believe that treatment of the Corsi action as related would serve the interests of judicial economy and avoid the potential for conflicting rulings; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Christopher Corsi v. Apple Inc. et al., Northern District of California, San Jose Division, Case No. CV 10-03316 PVT should be related to Charlene Gallion v. Apple Inc., Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Case No. CV 10-01610-RS. SO STIPULATED. Apple does not by this Stipulation concede any of the factual allegations of the cases or that certification of the putative classes is proper under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 STIPULATION RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CV 10-01610-RS sf-2879415 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 6, 2010 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW D. MUHLBACH HEATHER A. MOSER SAMUEL J. BOONE LUNIER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Andrew D. Muhlbach ANDREW D. MUHLBACH Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. Dated: August 6 , 2010 JEFFREY L. FAZIO DINA E. MICHELETTI FAZIO | MICHELETTI LLP KIMBERLY A. KRALOWEC THE KRALOWEC LAW GROUP EARL L. BOHACHEK LAW OFFICES OF EARL L. BOHACHEK By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Fazio JEFFREY L. FAZIO Attorneys for Plaintiff in Gallion v. Apple Inc. Dated: August 6 , 2010 ROSE F .LUZON JAMES C. SHAH SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP STEVEN A. SCHWARTZ TIMOTHY N. MATHEWS CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP By: /s/ James C. Shah JAMES C. SHAH Attorneys for Plaintiff in Corsi v. Apple Inc. STIPULATION RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CV 10-01610-RS sf-2879415 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Andrew D. Muhlbach, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document. By: /s/ Andrew D. Muhlbach STIPULATION RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CV 10-01610-RS sf-2879415 3