In Re Sony PS3 "Other OS" Litigation

Filing 20

Declaration of Tracy Tien in Support of 19 MOTION to Relate Case CORRECTION OF DOCKET # 16 . CORRECTION OF DOCKET # 17 . filed byTodd Densmore, Antal Herz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Related document(s) 19 ) (Tien, Tracy) (Filed on 5/17/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Rosemary M. Rivas (State Bar No. 209147) rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com Mark Punzalan (State Bar No. 247599) mpunzalan@finkelsteinthompson.com Tracy Tien (State Bar No. 253930) ttien@finkelsteinthompson.com FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 100 Bush Street, Suite 1450 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 398-8700 Facsimile: (415) 398-8704 Counsel for Plaintiffs Todd Densmore and Antal Herz [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY VENTURA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC., Defendant. This document also relates to: TODD DENSMORE and ANTAL HERZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 1 TIEN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CASE NO. 10-CV-1811 EMC Case No. 10-cv-1945 EDL Case No. 10-CV-1811 EMC DECLARATION OF TRACY TIEN IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED The Honorable Edward M. Chen The Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This document also relates to: JASON BAKER, SEAN BOSQUETT, FRANK BACHMAN, PAUL GRAHAM, and PAUL VANNATTA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, LLC successor to SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC. Defendant. Case No. 10-cv-1897 SC The Honorable Samuel Conti Case No. 10-cv-1975 JL This document also relates to: KEITH WRIGHT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff(s), v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC.; and SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, LLC. Defendants. The Honorable James Larson 2 TIEN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CASE NO. 10-CV-1811 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Tracy Tien, declare as follows: 1. I am an associate with Finkelstein Thompson LLP, counsel of record for Plaintiffs Todd Densmore and Antal Herz in the action Densmore, et al., v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-1945-EDL ("Densmore") filed on May 5, 2010 and currently assigned to the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte. I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related. This declaration is based on my own personal knowledge and if called to testify, I could and would do so competently as to the matters set forth herein. 2. complaint. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the complaint filed in Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Densmore Ventura v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., Case No.10-CV-1811-EMC, filed on April 27, 2010 and currently assigned to this Court. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the complaint filed in Baker et al v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Case No. 10-cv-01897-SC, filed on April 30, 2010 and currently assigned to the Honorable Samuel Conti. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the complaint filed in Wright v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. et al, Case No. 10-cv-01975-JL, filed on May 6, 2010 and currently assigned to the Honorable James Larson. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 17th day of May 2010 in San Francisco, California. /s/ Tracy Tien Tracy Tien 3 TIEN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CASE NO. 10-CV-1811 EMC