Orchard Supply Hardware LLC v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Answer filed by Home Depot USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 16, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP ROXANE A. POLIDORA (CA Bar No. 135972) roxane.polidora@pillsburylaw.com ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479) andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com LINDSAY A. LUTZ (CA Bar No. 254442) lindsay.lutz@pillsburylaw.com Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor Post Office Box 2824 San Francisco, CA 94126-2824 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile No.: (415) 983-1200 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) HOME DEPOT USA, INC., MILWAUKEE ) ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION, and ) ) MAKITA USA, INC., ) Defendants. ) ) ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE LLC, Case No.: 12-CV-6361 JST JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 704849928_1.DOCX -1- STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND Case No. 12-CV-6361 JST 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s September 19, 2013 Order Granting in Part and 2 Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 59), Defendant 3 Home Depot USA, Inc.’s answer to the Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff 4 Orchard Supply Hardware LLC on May 24, 2013 is currently due on October 18, 2013; 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Orchard Supply Hardware LLC filed a complaint in the above-captioned case on December 14, 2012; WHEREAS, Defendant has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to an additional two weeks for Defendant to answer the Second Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, Defendant has not previously requested an extension of the time to answer; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, as follows: Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties stipulate that Defendant’s answer to the Second Amended Complaint shall be due on November 1, 2013. Dated: October 15, 2013. 16 SO ORDERED: 17 18 The Honorable Jon S. Tigar District Court Judge 19 20 October 16, 2013 Date Entered 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 704849928_1.DOCX -2- STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND Case No. 12-CV-6361 JST PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP ROXANE A. POLIDORA ANDREW D. LANPHERE LINDSAY A. LUTZ Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 1 2 3 4 5 By: /s/ Roxane A. Polidora Roxane A. Polidora 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT USA, INC. 8 12 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM A. MARKHAM WILLIAM A. MARKHAM (CA Bar No. 132970) DORN GRAHAM BISHOP (CA Bar No. 147994) 550 West C Street, Suite 2040 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 221-4400 Facsimile: (619) 224-3974 13 By: 9 10 11 /s/ William A. Markham William A. Markham 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 15 16 17 18 ATTESTATION: Pursuant to to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories thereto. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 704849928_1.DOCX -3- STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND Case No. 12-CV-6361 JST