Apple Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Filing 32

Statement of Disclosure (Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 7.1) by Amazon Digital Services, Inc.. (Glick, Martin) (Filed on 4/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MARTIN R. GLICK (No. 40187) email: mglick@howardrice.com CLARA J. SHIN (No. 214809) email: cshin@howardrice.com SARAH J. GIVAN (No. 238301) email: sgivan@howardrice.com HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN A Professional Corporation Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4024 Telephone: 415/434-1600 Facsimile: 415/677-6262 Attorneys for Defendants AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, No. 11-cv-01327 PJH Action Filed: March 18, 2011 DEFENDANT AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC.’S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 7.1) Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMAZON DIGITAL’S FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STMT 11-cv-01327 PJH 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 7.1(a), the undersigned, counsel 2 of record for Defendant Amazon Digital Services, Inc., certifies that Amazon Digital 3 Services, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of parent company Amazon.com, Inc. No other 4 publicly held company owns more than 10% of Amazon Digital Services, Inc.’s stock. 5 6 DATED: April 18, 2011. 7 Respectfully, 8 MARTIN R. GLICK CLARA J. SHIN SARAH J. GIVAN HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN A Professional Corporation 9 10 11 12 13 14 By: /s/ Martin R. Glick MARTIN R. GLICK Attorneys for Defendants AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMAZON DIGITAL’S FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STMT -1- 11-cv-01327 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.