"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 256

Declaration of Eddy Cue in Support of 255 Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintffs' Motion to Modify Injunctive Relief Class Definition to Include iTMS Purchasers filed byApple Inc.. (Related document(s) 255 ) (Mittelstaedt, Robert) (Filed on 9/14/2009)

Download PDF
"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation" Case5:05-cv-00037-JW Document256 Filed09/14/09 Page1 of 2 Doc. 256 R o b e n A. Minelstaedt #60359 raminelstaedt@jonesday.com 2 3 4 Craig E. S t e w a n #129530 cestewart@jonesday.com Michael S c o n #255282 michaelscott@jonesday.com J O N E S DAY 555 C a l i f o r n i a S t r e e t , 2 6 t h F l o o r San F r a n c i s c o , C A 9 4 1 0 4 5 6 Telephone: Facsimile: A P P L E INC. (415) 6 2 6 - 3 9 3 9 (415) 875-5700 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 A n o m e y s for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T N O R T H E R N D I S T R I C T OF C A L I F O R N I A SAN J O S E D I V I S I O N T H E A P P L E iPOD iTUNES A N T I - T R U S T LITIGATION C a s e No. C 05-00037 J W C 06-04457 J W DECLARATION OF EDDY C U E IN S U P P O R T OF D E F E N D A N T ' S O P P O S I T I O N TO P L A I N T I F F S ' M O T I O N TO MODIFY I N J U N C T I V E RELIEF CLASS DEFINITION (SIGNATURE BY FAX) Date: Time: Octoher 5, 2009 9:00 A.M. Place: Courtroom 8, 4th floor 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECL. OF EDDY CUE ISO OPf. TO MOTION TO 1 M O D I F Y CLASS DEFINITION C OS.QOO)7 JW; C (l6..()4457 JW Dockets.Justia.com Case5:05-cv-00037-JW Document256 Filed09/14/09 Page2 of 2 I, Eddy Cue, declare as follows: 2 3 4 5 I. I a m e m p l o y e d by Apple Inc. as Vice President, Internet Services. I have held this position since August 2008. I have had responsibility for the iTunes Store since 2003. I make this declaration in support o f Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Modify Injunctive R e l i e f C l a s s D e f i n i t i o n t o I n c l u d e i T M S P u r c h a s e r s . T h e facts s t a t e d i n t h i s d e c l a r a t i o n a r e t r u e 6 7 and based upon my own personal knowledge, and i f called to testify to them, I would competently d o so. 8 9 10 11 12 2. A p p l e c o u l d n o t l a u n c h a c o m p l e t e l y D R M - f r e e v e r s i o n o f the i T u n e s M u s i c S t o r e until all a f t h e record labels that provided content to Apple agreed that Apple could sell their music without the use o f DRM. Well before the labels agreed to do so. Apple had publicly expressed its desire to sell DRM-free music. 3. N o w that the labels have agreed that Apple may sell music they provide to Apple 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 without the use o f DRM, Apple sells only DRM-free music. The other major online-music stores such as Wal-Mart and Amazon that compete with Apple similarly sell music without DRM. Apple is not aware that the record labels have any plans to reinstitute a DRM requirement and Apple has no intention o f operating a music store that sells DRM music in the future. I declare under penalty o f perjury under the laws o f the United States and the State o f California that the foregoing is true and correct. E x e c u t e d this !J....- day o f September 2009 in Cupertino, California. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SFI-618644vl 28 - 2DECL. O F EDDY C U E ISO OPP. T O MOTION T O M O D I F Y C L A S S DEFINITION . COS-OOOJ1JW;C06444S7JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.