"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 409

Declaration of Eddy Cue in Support of 408 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Apple Inc.. (Related document(s) 408 ) (Scott, Michael) (Filed on 12/23/2010) Modified on 12/27/2010 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation" Doc. 409 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R o b e r t A . Mittelstaedt #60359 ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com Craig E. S t e w a r t #129530 cestewart@jonesday.com D a v i d C. K i e r n a n #215335 dkiernan@jonesday.com M i c h a e l T. Scott #255282 michaelscott@jonesday.com JONES D A Y 555 C a l i f o r n i a S t r e e t , 2 6 t h F l o o r S a n Francisco, C A 94104 Telephone: (415) 6 2 6 - 3 9 3 9 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Attorneys for Defendant A P P L E INC. UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T C O U R T N O R T H E R N D I S T R I C T OF C A L I F O R N I A S A N JOSE DIVISION 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 T H E A P P L E iPOD iTUNES A N T I - T R U S T LITIGATION. Case N o . C 05-00037 J W ( H R L ) [CLASS A C T I O N ] DECLARATION OF EDDY CUE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Judge: Date: Time: Place: Honorable H o w a r d R. L l o y d January 18, 2011 1 0 : 0 0 a.m. C o u r t r o o m 2_5 th F l o o r 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, E d d y Cue, declare as follows: 1. I a m V i c e P r e s i d e n t , I n t e r n e t S e r v i c e s a t A p p l e Inc. ( " A p p l e " ) . I h a v e h e l d t h i s p o s i t i o n s i n c e A u g u s t 2008. I h a v e h a d responsibility for t h e i T u n e s S t o r e since 2003. 2. I s u b m i t this declaration i n s u p p o r t o f D e f e n d a n t ' s R e s p o n s e t o Plaintiffs' - 1Decl. ISO Dependent's Response to Plaintiffs' Amended Administrative Motion to Seal C 05 00037 JW (HRL) Dockets.Justia.com I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Amended Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions o f Plaintiffs' Opposition to Apple Inc. 's M o t i o n for Protective Order Preventing Deposition o f Steve Jobs, Portions o f the B e m a y Declaration a n d Exhibits 1-4 and 6-11 Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(b) and (c) ("Administrative M o t i o n " ) . T h e facts s t a t e d i n t h i s d e c l a r a t i o n are t r u e a n d b a s e d u p o n m y o w n p e r s o n a l knowledge, and i f called t o testify to them, I would competently do so. 3. The r e l i e f requested in the Administrative Motion is necessary and narrowly t a i l o r e d to p r o t e c t Apple's h i g h l y confidential a n d commercially sensitive b u s i n e s s information. The redacted portions o f the Plaintiffs' Opposition (Dkt. 404) and the B e m a y Declaration (Dkt. 4 0 5 ) c o n t a i n highly confidential a n d sensitive i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t m u s t b e k e p t c o n f i d e n t i a l i n o r d e r t o a v o i d c a u s i n g s u b s t a n t i a l h a r m t o Apple. T h e r e d a c t i o n s s p e c i f i c a l l y r e l a t e t o (1) s e n s i t i v e contract terms and communications with record labels; (2) updates to Apple's FairPlay digital rights management technology; and (3) business decisions and strategy at Apple. 4. Pages 4 and 10-11 o f Plaintiffs' Opposition (Dkt. 404) and Exhibits 1 and 6-7 to t h e B e m a y D e c l a r a t i o n (Dkt. 4 0 5 ) c o n t a i n h i g h l y c o n f i d e n t i a l a n d c o m m e r c i a l l y s e n s i t i v e b u s i n e s s i n f o r m a t i o n , i n c l u d i n g i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g sensitive c o n t r a c t t e r m s a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n s w i t h r e c o r d labels. 5. Apple's practices are that such information is to b e kept highly confidential and must not be publicly disclosed. A p p l e ' s contracts with record labels are subject t o confidentiality provisions a n d were produced to plaintiffs pursuant to the Stipulation and Protective Order Regarding Confidential Information entered June 1 3 , 2 0 0 7 ("Protective Order," Dkt. 112). Similarly, A p p l e ' s c o m m u n i c a t i o n s w i t h t h e r e c o r d labels c o n t a i n highly c o n f i d e n t i a l , c o m m e r c i a l l y sensitive business i n f o r m a t i o n a n d w e r e p r o d u c e d plaintiffs p u r s u a n t to t h e P r o t e c t i v e Order. T h e public disclosure o f this highly confidential i n f o r m a t i o n w o u l d c a u s e s u b s t a n t i a l h a r m t o Apple. 6. Pages 4-8 o f Plaintiffs' Opposition (Dkt. 404) and Page 1 and Exhibits 2, 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10, and 11 to the B e m a y Declaration (Dkt. 405) contain highly confidential and c o m m e r c i a l l y sensitive business information, including i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g u p d a t e s to A p p l e ' s F a i r P l a y D R M technology. -2Dec!. ISO Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Amended Administrative Motion to Seal C 05 00037 JW (HRL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 7. Apple's practices are that such infonnation is to b e kept higWy confidential and must not be publicly disclosed. FairPlay technology is a higWy protected trade secret, and Apple uses physical and electronic controls to protect it. The efficacy o f FairPlay is dependent o n the c o n f i d e n t i a l i t y o f i n f o n n a t i o n r e g a r d i n g i t s o p e r a t i o n and m a i n t e n a n c e . Only a f e w A p p l e e m p l o y e e s h a v e a c c e s s to a n d w o r k o n F a i r P l a y technology, a n d t h e y w o r k i n a r e s t r i c t e d a r e a a t Apple's headquarters. The public disclosure o f this higWy confidential infonnation would cause s u b s t a n t i a l h a r m t o Apple. 8. Pages i, 1 , 3 , 6 - 9 , and 11-12 o f Plaintiffs' Opposition (Dkt. 404) and Page 2 and Exhibits 2, 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10, and 11 to the Bernay Declaration (Dkt. 405) contain higWy c o n f i d e n t i a l a n d c o m m e r c i a l l y sensitive b u s i n e s s i n f o n n a t i o n , i n c l u d i n g i n f o n n a t i o n r e l a t i n g t o b u s i n e s s d e c i s i o n s a n d strategy a t Apple. 9. Apple's practices are that such infonnation is to be kept higWy confidential and must not be publicly disclosed. The infonnation was produced to plaintiffs pursuant to the P r o t e c t i v e Order. T h e i n f o n n a t i o n p r o d u c e d t o p l a i n t i f f s i s n o n - p u b l i c i n f o n n a t i o n from a p u b l i c c o m p a n y t h a t s h o u l d r e m a i n confidential. H a r m to A p p l e w o u l d r e s u l t f r o m t h e p u b l i c d i s c l o s u r e o f t h e r e d a c t e d i n f o n n a t i o n c o n t a i n e d i n t h e s e documents. T h e p u b l i c d i s c l o s u r e o f i n f o n n a t i o n r e g a r d i n g A p p l e ' s b u s i n e s s d e c i s i o n s a n d strategies w o u l d p u t A p p l e a t a s i g n i f i c a n t b u s i n e s s disadvantage. I d e c l a r e u n d e r p e n a l t y o f perjury u n d e r the l a w s o f the U n i t e d States a n d the State o f California t h a t the foregoing is true and correct. E x e c u t e d t h i s 2 2 n d day o f D e c e m b e r , 2 0 1 0 i n 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 iJJ;0' ~a. E d d y Cue SFI-657739vl -3- Decl. ISO D e f e n d a n t ' s Response to Plaintiffs' Amended Administrative Motion to Seal C 05 00037 JW (HRL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.