"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 88

ORDER re 87 Parties' Proposed Form of Protective Order. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 12/15/06. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 12/15/2006)

"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation" Doc. 88 Case 5:05-cv-00037-JW Document 88 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOR THE RN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court 11 12 For the Northern District of California SOMTAI TROY CHAROENSAK, et al., 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) APPLE COMPUTER, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) ) Case No.: C 05-0037 JW (PVT) ORDER RE PARTIES' PROPOSED FORM OF PROTECTIVE ORDER On December 11, 2006, the parties filed a proposed form of protective order regarding confidential information.1 Based on the proposed form submitted, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than January 3, 2006, the parties shall file a revised form of protective order that makes the following changes: 1. Des cri bes the information that may be designated as "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY" as "extremely sensitive CONFIDENTIAL information whose disclosure to another party or nonparty would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive means"; Expressly states that documents designated "CONFIDENTIAL" may be disclosed to the parties; Replaces the words "filed under seal" on page 5, line 12, with the words "submitted to the court with a request to file under seal"; and 2. 25 26 27 28 3. The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances underlying the present motion. OR D E R, page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Case 5:05-cv-00037-JW Document 88 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4. Replaces the wording in 11.(b) at page 7, lines 12-19, with: "The Clerk of the Court shall maintain under seal any documents that have been sealed by the court, subject to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) and any further order of the court." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of the final form of protective order, the provisions of the parties' proposed form of protective order, as modified herein, shall govern the handling of confidential information exchanged or produced in connection with this action. Dated: 12/15/06 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 12 For the Northern District of California 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 2