Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 204

ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND FILE A STIPULATION AS TO THE DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 201 Letter, 202 Letter filed by Apple, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, 203 Letter. On or before September 30, 2009, the parties shall f ile such Stipulation for the Court's approval. In the event that the parties are unable to agreed on a schedule, the Court will set at briefing schedule that is consistent with the Civil Local Rules of the Court. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/21/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580) Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr. (Bar No. 120965) Christopher S. Yates (Bar No. 161273) Sadik Huseny (Bar No. 224659) 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 Email: Dan.Wall@lw.com Email: Al.Pfeiffer@lw.com Email: Chris.Yates@lw.com Email: Sadik.Huseny@lw.com Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNIT ED S UNIT ED S S DISTRISTR I CT C C TE IT A ES D T T C TA R NIA A ER LI C N ER F C D IN T I C T O SD R OF IS T RIC T H [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IN RE APPLE & AT&TM ANTI-TRUST LITIGATION CASE NO. C 07-5152 JW ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER MEET AND CONFER AND FILE A MODIFYING DISCOVERY SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED STIPULATION AS TO THE DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE [Filed Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2] OnThe Court finds good cause to GRANT in part, the parties' Stipulation to modify the and August 20, 2009, the Court issued an order modifying the class discovery schedule continuing the hearing on Plaintiffs' anticipated Motion for Class Certification to March 22, 2010 January 1, 2007 Discovery 199.) The Court ordered the parties to meet and confer beyond the at 9 a.m. (Docket Item No.Schedule. However, the parties' Proposed Schedule goesto develop a discovery and briefing schedule that would assist the parties in meeting the new deadlines. time that the Court 2 and September 10, 2009, the Court received separate letters from the Between Septemberwould otherwise provide. Accordingly, the Court continues the anticipated parties informing the Court that they are unable stipulate to a schedule. (See Docket Item Nos. Class Certification Motion from December 7, once again orders 2010 at 9 a.m. All briefing 201-03.) Upon review of the letters, the Court2009 to March 22,the parties to meet and conferon and develop their own schedule to meet the Court's deadlines. On or before September 30, 2009, Class Certification such Stipulation for the before approval. In the event that the parties are the parties shall fileshall be completed on or Court's March 1, 2010. The parties shall meet and unable to agreed on a schedule, the Court will set at briefing schedule that is consistent with the confer and Rules of a discovery Civil Local develope the Court. and briefing schedule that would assist the parties in meeting the above deadlines. September 21, Septem 19, 2009 Dated: August ber 17, 2009 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SA N F R A N C I S C O ________________________ JAMES WARE United States District Judge STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NUMBER: C 07-05152 JW LI A FO re mes Wa Judge Ja es Ware dge Jam Ju FO R NIA DERED SO OR ORDERED IT IS O IT IS S IFIED S MOD A RT U O RT U O NO NO RT RT H