Levitte v. Google Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER Granting Motion to Relate Cases C-08-3369 JW, C-08-3452 RMW, C-08-4701 PVT and C-08-3888 SI re 28 MOTION to Relate Cases. Motions terminated: 28 MOTION to Relate Cases C08-3369 JW, C08-3452 RMW, C08-4701 PVT and C08-3888 SI filed by Google Inc. The parties are to file a joint case management conference statement by 2/13/09. ***Related cases require filing for each related case in their respective dockets.*** Initial Case Management Conference set for ALL CASES on 2/23/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/3/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008) Modified on 12/9/2008 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Levitte v. Google Inc. Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. C 08-03369 JW C 08-03452 RMW Levitte v. Google Inc. RK West, Inc. V. Google, Inc. I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. ____JW_____ C 08-03888 SI Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google Inc. I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _____JW____ C 08-04701 PVT JIT Packing. Inc v. Google, Inc. I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. ____JW_____ ORDER Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge. Dated: November 3, 2008 Judge James Ware -1- Dockets.Justia.com CLERK'S NOTICE The court has reviewed the motion and determined that the listed are related and reassignments shall occur. The Court terminates all previously set deadlines, hearings and motions. Any previously filed motions must be re-noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge. The Court sets a Case management Conference as to ALL cases for February 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM. The parties are to file a joint case management conference statement in their respective case dockets by February 13, 2009. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk DATED: __November 3, 2008 __ By: Deputy Clerk Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Case Systems Administrators Counsel of Record Entered into Assignment Program: (date) -2-