Levitte v. Google Inc.

Filing 7

Proposed Order re 5 MOTION to Relate Case by Pulaski & Middleman, LLC. (Saveri, Guido) (Filed on 9/2/2008)

Download PDF
Levitte v. Google Inc. Doc. 7 1, 2 J 4 5 6 .7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 1'1, 12 13 1.4 HAL K. LEVITTE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff. V. Case No. 08-03369-JV/ IPROPOSEDI ORDER RELATTNG CASES 15 16 GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 17 18 This Document Relates to: 19 20 21. PULASKI & MIDDLEMAN, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff. V. 22 23 GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 24 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 IPROPOSEDI ORDER RELATTNG CASES Dockets.Justia.com 1, On September 2,2008, plaintiff Pulaski & Middleman,LLC filed an Administrative 2 J ^ Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related Cases pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. The Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, 4 5 6 HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff s Administrative Motion to Relate Cases. cases are related: IT IS SO ORDERED that the following 7 Levitte v. Google, Inc., Case No. 08-03369-JW; I 9 RKll/est, Inc. v. Google, Inc.,CaseNo.08-03452-RS; and Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google, Inc., Case No. 08-3888-5I. 10 11, IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: 't4 15 The Honorable James Ware United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 IPROPOSED] ORDER RELATING CASES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.