Levitte v. Google Inc.

Filing 90

Statement of Non-Opposition to 88 Motion for Administrative Relief To Modify Case Management Schedule filed by Hal K. Levitte. (Jonckheer, Willem) (Filed on 6/24/2010) Modified on 6/24/2010,(counsel failed to properly link to motion.) (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Lev i tte v. Google Inc. Do c. 90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 v. EDWARD EUGENE RICKS, et al., Defendant. _________________________________ ALAN A BRADFORD, a California corporation, Cross-Complainant, v. EDWARD EUGENE RICKS, et al., Cross-Defendants / TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS LOCAL 7 PENSION TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs, No.02-01059 CW ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 14 For the Northern District of California 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Chen's Report and Recommendation Re: Cross-Complainant's Motion for Default Judgment. No objections to the Report were filed. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect except that the Court calculates the interest as of September 1, 2003. Accordingly, Default judgment is entered in favor of Alan A. Bradford against E & T as a partnership and Edward, Lynda and Ted Ricks Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 as individuals for a total judgment of $125,544.93 (owed as of September 1, 2003). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/1/03 /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.