Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc.

Filing 5

Declination to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge by Facebook, Inc.. (Chiappetta, David) (Filed on 12/31/2008)

Download PDF
Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc. Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 David Chiappetta, (State Bar No. 172099) dchiappetta@perkinscoie.com Kaycie Wall, (State Bar No. 226027) kwall@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 101 Jefferson Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025-1114 Telephone: 650.838.4300 Facsimile: 650.838.4350 James McCullagh, pro hac vice pending jmccullagh@perkinscoie.com Joseph Cutler, pro hac vice pending jcutler@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Attorneys for Plaintiff FACEBOOK, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. POWER VENTURES, INC. d/b/a POWER.COM, a California corporation, Defendant. Case No. C08 05780 WDB DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge. 60406-0005/LEGAL15107313.1 -1- DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: December 31, 2008 PERKINS COIE LLP By: /s/ David Chiappetta, (State Bar No. 172099) dchiappetta@perkinscoie.com Attorney for Plaintiff FACEBOOK, INC. 60406-0005/LEGAL15107313.1 -2- DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.