Boy Racer, Inc v. Does 1-52

Filing 26

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Show Cause Response due by 3/23/2012. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 3/8/2012. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 BOY RACER, INC., 14 Plaintiff, v. 15 16 DOES 1-52, Defendants. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 11-CV-2329-PSG ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 18 On May 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed the operative complaint. After a series of motions and 19 court orders related to Plaintiff’s initial ex parte application for leave to take early discovery, which 20 21 22 the court granted-in-part,1 and follow-up application for leave to take further early discovery, which the court denied,2 the court denied Plaintiff’s motion to certify for appeal its interlocutory order denying further ex parte discovery.3 There has been no activity on the docket since that order. 23 24 25 1 Docket No. 8. 2 Docket No. 21. 3 Docket No. 25. 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 11-2329 ORDER As the 120-day deadline for service has long since passed,4 the court hereby ORDERS 1 2 Plaintiff to show cause why the court should not dismiss its claims pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. 3 No later than March 23, 2012, Plaintiff shall file a response to the order to show cause. Failure to 4 comply will result in dismissal. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 3/8/2012 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4 27 28 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (“If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court – on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff – must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.”). 2 Case No.: 11-2329 ORDER