Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 59

STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Re: Extending Plaintiffs' Time to File a First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1)(B) by Doe I, Doe II, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V, Doe VI, Liu Guifu, Ivy He, Charles Lee, Roe VII, Roe VIII. (Boyd, Kathryn) (Filed on 8/24/2011)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 KATHRYN LEE BOYD, ESQ. (SBN 189496) lboyd@srbr-law.com RAJIKA L. SHAH, ESQ. (SBN 232994) rshah@srbr-law.com SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD & RADER, LLP 6310 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 360 Los Angeles, California 90048 Phone: (323) 302-9488 Fax: (323) 931-4990 TERRI MARSH, ESQ. (pro hac vice) terri.marsh@hrlf.net BRIAN PIERCE, ESQ. (pro hac vice) bjpierce@gmail.com HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOUNDATION 1615 L Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: (202) 369-4977 Fax: (202) 355-6701 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF-PSG DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE, Assigned to the Honorable Jeremy Fogel, ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu, U.S.D.J. 18 Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 23 24 vs. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., John CHAMBERS, Thomas LAM, Owen CHAN, and DOES 1100, Defendants. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 15(a)(1)(B) Action Filed: May 19, 2011 Scheduling Conference: September 23, 2011 Time: 10:30 am Courtroom: 3, 5th floor 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE A FAC PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 15(a)(1)(B) Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF-PSG STIPULATION 1 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE 3 III, DOE IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE, ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu (“Plaintiffs”) 4 and Defendants CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (“Cisco”), John CHAMBERS (“Chambers”), Thomas 5 LAM (“Lam”), and Owen CHAN (“Chan”) (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), as 6 follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 7 8 was due no later than August 4, 2011 (docket entry “DE” 25); WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss on August 4, 2011 (DE 49); 9 WHEREAS, the Parties held a telephonic conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 10 11 26(f) on August 5, 2011, in which Plaintiffs notified Defendants that they expected to file a First 12 Amended Complaint as a matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1)(B) by August 13 25, 2011; WHEREAS, on Sunday, August 14, 2011, Terri Marsh, lead counsel for Plaintiffs, was 14 15 involved in a head-on automobile collision and suffered injuries including whiplash, facial 16 contusions, and minor cuts and bruises, and has been unable to return to work and address the 17 expected amendments to the Complaint; 18 WHEREAS, on August 22, 2011, Terri Marsh emailed Kathleen Sullivan, lead counsel 19 for Defendants, and requested that, on account of the extenuating circumstances relating to her 20 car accident, Plaintiffs be given additional time to file their expected First Amended Complaint as 21 a matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1)(B); and WHEREAS, Kathleen Sullivan agreed to extend Plaintiffs’ time to file their expected 22 23 First Amended Complaint from August 25, 2011, by seven (7) to ten (10) days. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE A FAC PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 15(a)(1)(B) Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF-PSG NOW THEREFOR IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties, 1 2 through their respective counsel, that if Plaintiffs file a First Amended Complaint as a matter of 3 course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1)(B), such First Amended Complaint shall be filed 4 on or before September 2, 2011. 5 DATED: August 24, 2011 SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD & RADER, LLP 6 7 By: 8 /s/ K. Lee Boyd K. Lee Boyd, Esq. 9 HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOUNDATION 10 11 12 DATED: August 24, 2011 By: 13 /s/ Terri Marsh Terri E. Marsh, Esq. (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 DATED: August 24, 2011 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 16 17 By: 18 /s/ Kathleen Sullivan Kathleen Sullivan, Esq.1 Isaac Nesser, Esq. 19 Attorneys for Defendants 20 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 DATED: , 2011 _________________________________________ Hon. Jeremy Fogel 24 25 26 27 28 1 I have given my consent for Plaintiffs to electronically sign this Stipulation on my behalf. -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE A FAC PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 15(a)(1)(B) Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF-PSG