Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 77

Proposed Order re 76 MOTION to Reschedule Briefing Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 7-11 by Doe I, Doe II, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V, Doe VI, Liu Guifu, Ivy He, Charles Lee, Roe VII, Roe VIII. (Boyd, Kathryn) (Filed on 11/8/2011)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KATHRYN LEE CRAWFORD-BOYD, ESQ. (SBN 189496) lboyd@srbr-law.com RAJIKA L. SHAH, ESQ. (SBN 232994) rshah@srbr-law.com SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD & RADER, LLP 6310 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 360 Los Angeles, California 90048 Phone: (323) 302-9488, Fax: (323) 931-4990 TERRI MARSH, ESQ. (pro hac vice) terri.marsh@hrlf.net BRIAN PIERCE, ESQ. (pro hac vice) brianp@hrlf.net HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOUNDATION 1615 L Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: (202) 369-4977, Fax: (323) 931-4990 12 JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY (pro hac vice) jchomsky@igc.org LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY 8210 New Second Street Elkins Park, PA 19027 Phone: (215) 782-8327, Fax: (215)782-8368 13 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS 10 11 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE, ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu, and those individual similarly situated, 18 19 20 Plaintiffs, 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RESCHEDULE BRIEFING [N.D.Cal. Local Rule 7-11] Action Filed: May 19, 2011 FAC Filed: Sept. 2, 2011 vs. 21 22 Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx Assigned to the Hon. Edward J. Davila CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., John CHAMBERS, Thomas LAM, Owen CHAN, Fredy CHEUNG, and DOES 1100, 24 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD & RADER, LLP 6310 San Vicente Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90048 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RESCHEDULE BRIEFING Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Upon the Motion to Reschedule Briefing submitted by Plaintiffs DOE I, DOE II, 2 3 Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE, ROE VIII, and LIU 4 Guifu (“Plaintiffs”), the Court, having considered the papers submitted, HEREBY 5 ORDERS THAT: 1. 6 Briefing on only the following three questions raised by the Motion to 7 Dismiss filed by Defendants CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (“Cisco”), John CHAMBERS 8 (“Chambers”), Thomas LAM (“Lam”), Owen CHAN (“Chan”), and Fredy CHEUNG 9 (“Cheung”) (“Defendants”) on September 23, 2011 (Docket Entry 67) (“Motion to 10 Dismiss”) will continue on the current briefing schedule established in the Court’s Order 11 dated October 11, 2011 (Docket Entry 74):1 (1) whether the case presents a non-justiciable 12 political question, (2) whether the complaint challenges an act of state, and (3) whether 13 the case violates principles of international comity. 2. 14 Briefing on all other issues raised by Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is 15 rescheduled until after the U.S. Supreme Court issues its decision in Kiobel v. Royal 16 Dutch Petroleum Co. and Mohamad v. Rajub, Nos. 10-1491 and 11-88, --- S.Ct. ----, 79 17 USLW 3728 (2011), cert. granted October 17, 2011. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 Dated: __________________ 23 _____________ Hon. Edward J. Davila United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 1 28 SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD & RADER, LLP 6310 San Vicente Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90048 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is due November 18, 2011, while Defendants’ Reply is due January 16, 2012, with hearing scheduled for February 17, 2012. 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RESCHEDULE BRIEFING Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx