In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 135

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying (134) Stipulation in case 5:11-cv-02509-LHK.Associated Cases: 5:11-cv-02509-LHK, 5:11-cv-03538-LHK, 5:11-cv-03539-LHK, 5:11-cv-03540-LHK, 5:11-cv-03541-LHK, 5:12-cv-01262-LHK(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document134 Filed05/23/12 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607) Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716) Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) Brendan Glackin (State Bar No. 199643) Dean Harvey (State Bar No. 250298) Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928) LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: 415.956.1000 Facsimile: 415.956.1008 [Additional counsel listed on signature page] Interim Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Class 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 14 IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION 15 16 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS 17 Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE__ AS MODIFIED 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1039341.2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document134 Filed05/23/12 Page2 of 4 1 ALL PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE: 2 Due to a conflict in the current schedule for Plaintiffs’ counsel, by agreement of all 3 counsel, the parties respectfully request that the Case Management Conference set by the Court 4 for May 31, 2012 be postponed to June 4, 2012, at a time convenient for the Court. The Court has 5 offered June 1 and June 13 as possible alternate dates, but not all counsel are available on those 6 dates. 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: 8 Dated: May 23, 2012 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 9 10 By: ___/s/ Joseph R. Saveri __________________ Joseph R. Saveri 11 Interim Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Class 12 13 Dated: May 23, 2012 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: 14 15 /s/ Michael F. Tubach Michael F. Tubach Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc. 16 17 Dated: May 23, 2012 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP By: 18 19 /s/ Daniel Purcell Daniel Purcell Attorneys for Defendant Lucasfilm Ltd. 20 21 Dated: May 23, 2012 JONES DAY By: 22 23 /s/ David C. Kiernan David C. Kiernan Attorneys for Defendant Adobe Systems Inc. 24 25 Dated: May 23, 2012 MAYER BROWN LLP By: 26 27 /s/ Lee H. Rubin Lee H. Rubin Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 28 1039341.2 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document134 Filed05/23/12 Page3 of 4 1 Dated: May 23, 2012 2 By: 3 Dated: May 23, 2012 6 /s/ Robert A. Mittelstaedt Robert A. Mittelstaedt Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc. 8 10 JONES DAY By: 7 9 /s/ Frank Hinman Frank Hinman Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corp. 4 5 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP Dated: May 23, 2012 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: 11 12 /s/ Emily Johnson Henn Emily Johnson Henn Attorneys for Defendant Pixar 13 14 Filer’s Attestation 15 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in 16 the filing of the document has been obtained from all the signatories. 17 18 Dated: May 23, 2012 /s/ Dean M. Harvey Dean M. Harvey 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1039341.2 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document134 Filed05/23/12 Page4 of 4 1 2 3 The stipulation is DENIED. The case management conference is continued to July 25, 2012, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. at 2:00 p.m. May 24, Dated: ________________. 2012 By: 4 ______________________________ Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 S RT ER 27 R NIA ucy H. Ko h A H 26 Judge L FO NO 25 ERED O ORD IT IS S DIFIED AS MO LI UNIT ED 24 RT U O 23 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 1039341.2 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK