In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 176

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting (175) Stipulation in case 5:11-cv-02509-LHK. Associated Cases: 5:11-cv-02509-LHK, 5:11-cv-03538-LHK, 5:11-cv-03539-LHK, 5:11-cv-03540-LHK, 5:11-cv-03541-LHK, 5:12-cv-01262-LHK(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2012)

Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607) Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716) Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. 199643) Dean M. Harvey (State Bar No. 250298) Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928) LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM 255 California, Suite 450 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 500-6800 Facsimile: (415) 500-6803 Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 18 19 IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 20 ALL ACTIONS Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1046831.4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page2 of 6 1 2 ALL PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE: Pursuant to the Court’s July 2, 2012 Order re Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 165), counsel for 3 4 all parties have conferred and propose the following extensions of the case schedule: 5 6 EVENT CURRENT PROPOSED 7 Motion for Class Certification July 19, 2012 September 17, 2012 Opposition to Motion for Class Certification August 30, 2012 October 29, 2012 Reply In Support of Class Certification September 20, 2012 November 26, 2012 13 Hearing on Motion for Class Certification October 11, 2012 December 13, 20121 14 Fact Discovery Cutoff November 30, 2012 January 29, 2013 Opening Expert Reports December 14, 2012 February 12, 2013 Opposition Expert Reports January 4, 2013 March 5, 2013 Expert Discovery Cutoff January 25, 2013 March 26, 2013 Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions February 7, 2013 April 11, 2013 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Oppositions to Dispositive and Daubert Motions May 10, 2013 Replies to Dispositive and Daubert Motions May 31, 2013 26 27 28 1 Plaintiffs’ counsel are available on December 20, 2012, but Defendants’ counsel are not. Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ counsel are available on December 13, 2012. 1046831.4 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EVENT CURRENT PROPOSED Hearing on Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions March 14, 2013 June 20, 2013 Pretrial Conference May 15, 2013 July 31, 2013 or August 21, 20132 Jury Trial Begins June 10, 2013 August 27, 2013 or November 11, 20133 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: Dated: July 9, 2012 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP By: 13 14 /s/ Kelly M. Dermody Kelly M. Dermody Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607) Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716) Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. 199643) Dean M. Harvey (State Bar No. 250298) Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928) LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 The parties have agreed to the revised schedule with the exception of the trial date (see n.3). The pre-trial conference dates reflect these separate proposed trial dates. 3 Plaintiffs request a November 11, 2013 trial date in order to accommodate a pre-existing conflict that several of Plaintiffs’ Counsel have with another trial set to commence on September 9, 2013 and run through early October 2013 in In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation, No. 10-CV-00318 (RDB) (D. Md.). Present Interim Co-Lead Counsel Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and Joseph Saveri of the Joseph Saveri Law firm are also Interim Co-Lead Counsel in Titanium Dioxide, and Mr. Saveri will serve as co-lead trial counsel in Titanium Dioxide. The Berger & Montague firm, Plaintiffs’ co-counsel here, are also Court-appointed Executive Committee members in the Titanium Dioxide case and will be serving on the trial team. The Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A. firm, also serves as Plaintiffs' co-counsel here and on the Executive Committee in Titanium Dioxide. Defendants propose a trial date in August 2013 in light of the Court’s order granting a two-month extension and requesting a revised schedule which extends all deadlines correspondingly (Dkt. No. 165). 1046831.4 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page4 of 6 1 2 Dated: July 9, 2012 3 By: 4 /s/ Joseph R. Saveri Joseph R. Saveri Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM 255 California, Suite 450 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.500.6800 Facsimile: 415.500.6803 5 6 7 8 Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 9 10 JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM Dated: July 9, 2012 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: 11 12 /s/ Michael F. Tubach Michael F. Tubach Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc. 13 14 Dated: July 9, 2012 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP By: 15 16 /s/ Daniel Purcell Daniel Purcell Attorneys for Defendant Lucasfilm Ltd. 17 18 Dated: July 9, 2012 JONES DAY By: 19 20 /s/ David C. Kiernan David C. Kiernan Attorneys for Defendant Adobe Systems Inc. 21 22 Dated: July 9, 2012 MAYER BROWN LLP By: 23 24 /s/ Lee H. Rubin Lee H. Rubin Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 25 26 Dated: July 9, 2012 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP By: 27 28 /s/ Frank Hinman Frank Hinman Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corp. 1046831.4 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page5 of 6 1 2 3 Dated: July 9, 2012 JONES DAY By: 4 /s/ Robert A. Mittelstaedt Robert A. Mittelstaedt Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc. 5 6 7 Dated: July 9, 2012 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: 8 9 /s/ Emily Johnson Henn Emily Johnson Henn Attorneys for Defendant Pixar 10 11 Filer’s Attestation 12 13 14 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from all the signatories. 15 16 Dated: July 9, 2012 /s/ Dean M. Harvey Dean M. Harvey 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1046831.4 -4- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page6 of 6 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 6 July 10, Dated: ________________. 2012 By: Honorable United ______________________________ Lucy H. Koh Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1046831.4 -5- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK