In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 359

ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on March 15, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 IN RE HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION 13 14 15 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS ) ) Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK ) ) ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF ) RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS ) ) ) ) 16 On March 14, 2013, Defendants submitted statements regarding the number of documents 17 18 each Defendant has redacted based on lack of relevance and/or responsiveness. The Court will not 19 permit Defendants to redact information based on Defendants’ unilateral assessment of lack of 20 relevance and/or responsiveness. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that all Defendants 21 produce any documents that they have redacted for lack of relevance and/or responsiveness in their 22 un-redacted form1 by March 19, 2013. The parties may meet and confer to agree upon the 23 redaction of these documents for public filings or use at a hearing or at trial. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: March 15, 2013 26 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 1 28 With the exception of redactions for privilege and/or redactions to protect the private information of non-parties. 1 Case No.: 5:11-CV-02509-LHK ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS