In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 373

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 343 Motion for Leave to File Recent Decision.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2013)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP JOHN KEKER - # 49092 jkeker@kvn.com DANIEL PURCELL - # 191424 dpurcell@kvn.com EUGENE M. PAIGE - # 202849 epaige@kvn.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 Attorneys for Defendant LUCASFILM LTD. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK 14 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 15 ALL ACTIONS 13 Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 16 17 Date Consol. Amended Compl. Filed: September 13, 2011 18 Trial Date: November 12, 2013 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK 733651.01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order allowing Defendants to file a Statement of Recent Decision. WHEREAS Defendants wish to file a Statement of Recent Decision in order to bring the recent Ninth Circuit decision Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc. to the Court’s attention. WHEREAS Plaintiffs do not stipulate that the Wang decision is relevant, Plaintiffs also do not oppose the filing of Defendants’ Statement of Recent Decision. Therefore, subject to the approval of this Court, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate and agree to the filing of Defendants’ Statement of Recent Decision. 9 10 Dated: March 8, 2013 11 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP By: /s/ Kelly M. Dermody Kelly M. Dermody 12 17 Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607) Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716) Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) Brendan Glackin (State Bar No. 199643) Dean Harvey (State Bar No. 250298) Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928) 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3339 Telephone: 415.956.1000 Facsimile: 415.956.1008 18 Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Class 13 14 15 16 19 Dated: March 8, 2013 JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 By: /s/ Joseph R. Saveri Joseph R. Saveri Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) Lisa J. Leebove (State Bar No. 186705) James G. Dallal (State Bar No. 277826) JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM 255 California, Suite 450 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415. 500.6800 Facsimile: 415. 500.6803 Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Class 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK 733651.01 1 Dated: March 8, 2013 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2 By: /s/ Michael F. Tubach Michael F. Tubach 3 4 7 George Riley Michael F. Tubach Christina J. Brown Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 8 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 5 6 9 Dated: March 8, 2013 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 10 By: /s/ Justina K. Sessions Justina K. Sessions 11 12 John W. Keker Daniel Purcell Eugene M. Page Justina K. Sessions 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 381-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant LUCASFILM LTD. 17 Dated: March 8, 2013 JONES DAY 18 19 By: /s/ David C. Kiernan David C. Kiernan 20 21 22 23 Robert A. Mittelstaedt Craig A. Waldman David C. Kiernan 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 24 Attorneys for Defendant ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK 733651.01 1 Dated: March 8, 2013 JONES DAY 2 By: /s/ Robert A. Mittelstaedt Robert A. Mittelstaedt 3 4 Robert A. Mittelstaedt Craig E. Stewart 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 5 6 7 Catherine T. Zeng 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 739-3939 Facsimile: (650) 739-3900 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant INTUIT INC. 11 Dated: March 8, 2013 MAYER BROWN LLP 12 13 By: /s/ Lee H. Rubin Lee H. Rubin 14 18 Lee H. Rubin Edward D. Johnson Donald M. Falk Two Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 300 Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2057 Facsimile: (650) 331-4557 19 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 15 16 17 20 Dated: March 8, 2013 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 21 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ Frank M. Hinman Frank M. Hinman Donn P. Pickett Frank M. Hinman Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 383-2286 26 Attorneys for Defendant INTEL CORPORATION 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK 733651.01 1 Dated: March 8, 2013 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 2 By: /s/ Emily Johnson Henn Emily Johnson Henn 3 4 6 Robert T. Haslam, III Emily Johnson Henn 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 632-4700 7 Attorneys for Defendant PIXAR 5 8 9 ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2013 By: HON. LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK 733651.01