In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 69

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion for Leave to File.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master Docket No. C 11-02509 LHK 6 7 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 8 ALL ACTIONS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT LUCASFILM LTD.’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE A SEPARATE MOTION TO DISMISS 9 10 11 AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT 12 Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 13 Date Comp. Filed: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Docket No. C 11-02509 LHK May 4, 2011 1 Defendant Lucasfilm Ltd. (“Lucasfilm”) has filed a motion for administrative relief under 2 Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-11 requesting leave to file a separate motion to dismiss 3 plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Complaint”). For the reasons stated in 4 Lucasfilm’s motion, and good cause having been shown, the Court GRANTS the motion, in part, 5 and denies it in part. 6 Lucasfilm may file a separate motion to dismiss of no longer than 5 pages, addressing the 7 viability of plaintiffs’ Cartwright Act and UCL claims under the federal enclave doctrine. 8 Plaintiffs may file an opposition brief of no longer than 5 pages, and Lucasfilm may file a reply 9 brief of no longer than 3 pages. The motion shall be briefed on the existing schedule set forth in 10 the Court’s September 12, 2011 pretrial order. 11 12 Dated: September 28, 2011 13 14 15 ______________________________________ The Honorable Lucy H. Koh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 S RT H ER R NIA cy H. K oh FO NO 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 11-02509 LHK u J u d ge L A 28 ERED O ORD IT IS S DIFIED AS MO LI UNIT ED 27 RT U O 26 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C