Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 471

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/24/2013. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE, INC., a California corporation, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) corporation; and SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Clerk: Martha Parker Brown Reporter: Lee-Anne Shortridge 22 23 24 25 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Josh Krevitt, Mark Lyon, Mark Reiter, Bill Lee, Mark Selwyn Defendants’ Attorneys: Victoria Maroulis, William Price, Kevin Johnson, Todd Briggs A case management conference was held on April 24, 2013. A further case management conference is set for June 26, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. By May 8, 2013, each side shall file a Case Narrowing Statement with a revised list of no more than 22 accused products. 26 27 28 By May 29, 2013, the parties shall file a joint status report regarding the parties’ ability to stipulate to representative products. The Court strongly encourages the parties to reach a stipulation on this issue. 1 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 By June 28, 2013, the parties will be required to dismiss without prejudice two patents from the case so that neither side will be asserting more than six patents. In addition, the parties will be required to limit their asserted claims to 15 per side and limit their accused products to 18 per side. By July 5, 2013, the parties will be required to reduce their invalidity references/systems/combinations to 45 per side. By September 2, 2013, the parties will be required to dismiss without prejudice one patent from the case so that neither side will be asserting more than five patents. In addition, the parties will be required to limit their asserted claims to 10 per side and limit their accused products to 15 per side. By September 9, 2013, the parties will be required to reduce their invalidity references/systems/combinations to 25 per side. 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 By February 6, 2014, the parties will be required to limit their asserted claims to 5 per side and limit their accused products to 10 per side. In addition, the parties will be required to reduce their invalidity references/systems/combinations to 15 per side. During expert discovery, each side will be limited to 15 experts and 15 opening expert reports. Each side shall be limited to filing no more than 5 Daubert motions in this case. At trial, each side shall be limited to no more than 12 testifying experts. The case schedule remains as set previously: Scheduled Event Date 16 Fact Discovery Cut-Off July 8, 2013 17 Initial Expert Disclosures July 26, 2013 Rebuttal Expert Reports August 16, 2013 18 Close of Expert Discovery August 30, 2013 19 Last Day to File Dispositive Motions September 26, 2013 20 Opposition Briefs on Dispositive Motions October 24, 2013 21 Reply Briefs on Dispositive Motions November 14, 2013 Hearing on Dispositive Motions (a hearing on Daubert motions will be scheduled at the next Case Management Conference) December 12, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. 22 23 Final Pretrial Conference March 5, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. 24 Jury Trial March 31, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. 25 Length of Trial 12 days 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: April 24, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER