Dunbar v. Google, Inc.

Filing 236

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 235 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)

Case5:12-cv-03305-LHK Document235 Filed12/27/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 COOLEY LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) (wsomvichian@cooley.com) MACO STEWART (pro hac vice) (maco.stewart@cooley.com) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 Case No. 12-CV-03305-LHK (PSG) KEITH DUNBAR, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT GOOGLE, INC., 15 Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 This Stipulation is entered into pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, by and between Plaintiff Keith Dunbar (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through the respective undersigned counsel. WHEREAS, on December 14, 2012, Plaintiff filed and served Plaintiff’s Third Amended Class Action Complaint (“Plaintiff’s TAC”) (Dkt. 228); WHEREAS, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(d) and 15(a)(3), Google’s response would be due on New Year’s Eve, and Google’s time to prepare its response would span the Christmas holiday; WHEREAS, the proximity of the holidays makes Google’s preparation of its answer to Plaintiff’s TAC within the allotted time unusually burdensome; WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-2, the Parties may stipulate in writing to request an 28 1299341 /SF 1. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR ANSWER 12-CV-03305-LHK (PSG) Case5:12-cv-03305-LHK Document235 Filed12/27/12 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 extension of the time for a deadline set by the Local Rules or the Federal Rules; WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties agree that extending the briefing schedule will permit Google to take additional care in answering Plaintiff’s TAC; WHEREAS, extending the dates for Google’s answer as set forth below will not alter any deadline already fixed by Court order; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree and request that Google’s deadline to file its answer to Plaintiff’s TAC be extended until January 14, 2013. 8 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 Dated: December 26, 2012 COOLEY LLP WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) 12 13 /s/ Whitty Somvichian 14 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 15 Dated: December 26, 2012 16 WYLY-ROMMEL, PLLC SEAN F. ROMMEL (pro hac vice) 17 /s/ Sean F. Rommel 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff Keith Dunbar 19 20 WYLY-ROMMEL, PLLC SEAN F. ROMMEL (pro hac vice) srommel@wylyrommel.com JAMES C. WYLY (pro hac vice) jwyly@wylyrommel.com 4004 Texas Boulevard Texarkana, TX 75503 Telephone: (903) 334-8646 Facsimile: (903) 334-8645 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1299341 /SF 2. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR ANSWER 12-CV-03305-LHK (PSG) Case5:12-cv-03305-LHK Document235 Filed12/27/12 Page3 of 3 1 CLAYEO C. ARNOLD A Professional Law Corporation CLAYEO C. ARNOLD (SBN 65070) KIRK J. WOLDEN (SBN 138902) kwolden@justice4you.com CLIFFORD L. CARTER (SBN 149621) ccarter@justice4you.com 865 Howe Avenue Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 924-3100 Facsimile: (916) 924-1829 2 3 4 5 6 7 CORY WATSON CROWDER & DEGARIS, P.C. F. Jerome Tapley (pro hac vice) jtapley@cwcd.com Hirlye R. Lutz, III (pro hac vice) rlutz@cwcd.com 2131 Magnolia Avenue Birmingham, AL 35205 Telephone: (205) 328-2200 Facsimile: (205) 324-7896 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff KEITH DUNBAR 14 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 December 28, 2012 Dated: __________________, 2012 ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, Whitty Somvichian hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 24 25 26 27 28 1299341 /SF 3. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR ANSWER 12-CV-03305-LHK (PSG)