Hohenberg v. Ferrero USA, Inc

Filing 145

MOTION to Vacate Judgment and for Indicative Ruling by Courtney Drey, Andrea Pridham. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities Motion to Vacate Judgment, # 2 Exhibit Ex A - Order in Unilever case, # 3 Exhibit Ex B - Order in Yelp case, # 4 Exhibit Ex C - Judge Whelan Order re Weston)(Pridham, Grenville) (ag).

Download PDF
1 2 3 Grenville Pridham 2522 Chambers Road, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 486-5144 grenville@grenvillepridham.com Counsel for Objectors COURTNEY DREY and ANDREA PRIDHAM 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE: FERRERO LITIGATION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC Pleading Type: Class Action OBJECTORS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60(B), AND FOR AN INDICATIVE RULING; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE FOR THE PURPOSES OF FILING THIS MOTION Judge: The Hon. Marilyn Huff Hearing: December 3, 2012 Time: 10:30 AM Location: Courtroom 13 19 20 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 3, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 13 of the 22 United States District Courthouse for the Southern District of California, which is located at 940 Front 23 St., San Diego, California 91201, Objectors COURTNEY DREY and ANDREA PRIDHAM will, and 24 hereby do, respectfully move the Court for an Order vacating judgment under rule 60(b), and for an 25 indicative ruling; or, in the alternative, for leave to intervene for the purposes of filing this motion. 26 /// 27 /// 28 Page 1 of 2 In re Ferrero Litigation, Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC Objectors’ Motion to Vacate Judgment under Rule 60(b), and for an Indicative Ruling; Or, in the Alternative, for Leave to Intervene for the Purposes of Filing this Motion 1 This motion is based on this Notice, Objectors’ supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, 2 the pleadings and papers on file in this action, any replies in support of the motions, and on such oral and 3 documentary evidence and argument as may be presented at the time of the hearing. 4 DATED: November 5, 2012. 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Grenville Pridham Grenville Pridham 2522 Chambers Road, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 486-5144 grenville@grenvillepridham.com Counsel for Objectors Drey and Pridham 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2 In re Ferrero Litigation, Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC Objectors’ Motion to Vacate Judgment under Rule 60(b), and for an Indicative Ruling; Or, in the Alternative, for Leave to Intervene for the Purposes of Filing this Motion