Haramis v. Mitchell

Filing 119

ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for Ruling 116 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration and to Vacate 03/13/2006 Order Denying Motion for Revival of Judgment 89 is DENIED by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/11/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 93-cv-01547-LTB MATTHEW EZEKIAL HARAMIS, Plaintiff, v. PRESTON MITCHELL, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________ Upon Plaintiff's Motion for Ruling (Doc 116) and Defendant's Response in Opposition to Motion to Reconsider or Vacate March 13, 2006 Order (Doc 118), it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Ruling (Doc 116) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and to Vacate March 13, 2006 Order Denying Motion for Revival of Judgment (Doc 89) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: March 11, 2009