Baker v. State of Colorado, The et al
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Default Judgment, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/5/2012.(jjpsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02578-PAB-KLM
REV. BRANDON BAKER,
THE STATE OF COLORADO and
A.G. JOHN SUTHERS,
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Default Judgment [Docket
No. 25] filed by plaintiff on December 13, 2011. Interpreting this document liberally, as I
am required to do because of plaintiff’s pro se status, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S.
519, 520 (1972); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 & n.3 (10th Cir. 1991), I
construe it as a motion for entry of default and default judgment.
In order to obtain a judgment by default, a party must follow the two-step process
described in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55: first, he or she must seek an entry of
default from the Clerk of the Court under Rule 55(a); second, after default has been
entered by the Clerk, the party must seek default judgment according to the strictures of
Rule 55(b). Williams v. Smithson, No. 95-7019, 1995 WL 365988 at *1 (10th Cir.
June 20, 1995) (unpublished table opinion) (citing Meehan v. Snow, 652 F.2d 274, 276
(2nd Cir. 1981)); Nasious v. Nu-Way Real Estate, No. 07-cv-01177-REB-MEH, 2008
WL 659667, at *1 (D. Colo. Mar. 6, 2008). Failure to successfully complete the first
step of obtaining an entry of default necessarily precludes the granting of default
judgment in step two. See Williams, 1995 WL 365988 at *1; Nasious, 2008 WL
659667, at *1.
In the present case, pursuant to the power granted in Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 55(a), the Clerk of the Court interpreted plaintiff’s filing as a request for entry
of default, but denied the request [Docket No. 28] due to the filing of responsive
pleading by defendants [Docket No. 23]. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) (“When a party
against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise
defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the
Because plaintiff failed to obtain an entry of default under Rule 55(a) at step one,
he may not obtain a default judgment at step two. Therefore, it is
ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for default judgment [Docket No. 25] is
DATED January 5, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.