Garcia v. Internal Revenue Service
MINUTE ORDER; In light of the Court's Recommendation 124 that this consolidated action be dismissed, Plaintiff's Motions 9 14 18 19 and 24 are DENIED AS MOOT, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/24/2013.(klmcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02482-WYD-KLM
LILIA E. GARCIA,
IRS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion to Continue Case” [Docket
No. 9; Filed October 4, 2012], “Motion to Not Remove Case” [#14; Filed October 5,
2012], “Motion Case Open” [#18; Filed October 9, 2012], “Motion to Deny” [#19; Filed
October 9, 2012] and “Motion to Answer” [#24; Filed October 11, 2012] (collectively, the
“Motions”). Defendants have not filed a response to any of the Motions.
In an Order issued on in October 11, 2012, this case was consolidated with Case
No. 12-cv–01824-WYD-KLM. [#23 of 12-cv-02482-WYD-KLM and #32 of 12-cv-01824WYD-KLM]. The Order directed that all pleadings and other filings be filed in Case No. 12cv–01824-WYD-KLM. Id. In addition, after granting Defendant’s Motion to Strike the
Amended Complaint in 12-cv-01824-WYD-KLM [#14] and Defendant’s Motion for a More
Definite Statement in 12-cv-02482-WYD-KLM [#10], the Court directed Plaintiff to submit
a Second Amended Complaint, to be filed in 12-cv-01824-WYD-KLM only. [#63 of 12-cv01824-WYD-KLM]. Thus, the Second Amended Complaint, had Plaintiff ever filed it, was
to be the operative complaint for the consolidated action.
The Court recently issued a Recommendation that this consolidated action be
dismissed. See [#124] of 12-cv-01824-WYD-KLM. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in light of the Court’s Recommendation [#124] that
this consolidated action be dismissed, Plaintiff’s Motions [## 9, 14, 18, 19 and 24] are
DENIED AS MOOT.
Dated: March 24, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.