NOKIA CORPORATION v. APPLE INC.

Filing 1

MOTION to Quash (filing fee $39, receipt number 461603897) by APPLE INC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Byron L. Pickard, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19)(smm) Modified on 5/20/2011 (smm).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS AD TESTIFICANDUM Case No. Nokia Corporation, Plaintiff V. I Case No. District Delaware 00791 -GMS Apple Inc., Defendant. DECLARATION OF BYRON L. PICKARD, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF NONPARTIES’ MOTION TO QUASH NOKIA SUBPOENAS AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER I, Byron L. Pickard, declare as follows: I am an attorney with Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC ("SKGF"), counsel for nonparties Robert Greene Sterne, Glenn Perry, Rich Coller and Salvador Bezos (collectively, the "Apple Attorneys") for the purpose of responding to subpoenas issued by Nokia, Inc., the Plaintiff in the above-captioned action. This declaration is based upon my personal knowledge or upon publicly available information that I have either reviewed or become aware of in the course of this litigation. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a subpoena dated March 24, 2011, directed to Robert G. Sterne, an attorney with SKGF. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a subpoena dated March 24, 2011, directed to Glenn J. Perry, an attorney with SKGF. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a subpoena dated March 24, 2011, directed to Richard D. Coller III, an attorney with SKGF. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of a subpoena dated March 24, 2011, directed to Salvador M. Bezos, an attorney with SKGF. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a letter from Byron L. Pickard to Rohan Kale, dated April 8, 2011. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of an email from Rohan Kale to Byron L. Pickard, dated April 14, 2011. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of an email exchange between Rohan Kale and Byron Pickard, dated May 5, 2011. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of an Ex Pane Reexamination Interview Summary for Application No. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of an Ex Porte Reexamination Interview Summary for Application No. 11. 90/010,964, dated January 5, 2011, 90/010,967, dated February 8, 2011. Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of an Ex Porte Reexamination Interview Summary for Application No. 90/010,965, dated December 21, 2011. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of an Reexamination Interview Summary for Application No. 13. Ex Parte 90/010,966, dated April 11, 2011. Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Statement of Substance of the Ex Pane Reexamination Interview for Application No. 95/010,964. 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Statement of Substance of the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 95/010,967. 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of Apples Statements of Substance of the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 95/010,965. 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Statement of Substance of the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 95/010,966. 17. Attached hereto as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of the detailed slide presentation used during the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 90/010,964. 18. Attached hereto as Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of the detailed slide presentation used during the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 90/010,967. 19. Attached hereto as Exhibit 18 is a true and correct copy of the detailed slide presentation used during the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 90/0 10,965. 20. Attached hereto as Exhibit 19 is a true and correct copy of the detailed slide presentation used during the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 90/010,966. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. Executed this 17th day of May, 2011, in Washington, D.C. Byron L. Pickard STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & Fox PLLC 1100 New York Avenue, NW Washington DC 20005