Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
ORDER that the 268 Motion for Early Pretrial Conference is DENIED. As ordered by this Court in its March 3, 2011 Scheduling Order, theparties are directed to file a pre-trial order with this Court by April 29, 201l. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 4/6/2011. (ank)
FILED IN CHAMBER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
APR 0 6 "011 L
and SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-1425-0DE
MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as President of Georgia State University; RISA PALM, in her official capacity as Senior Vice
President for Academic Affairs
and Provost of Georgia State University; J.L. ALBERT, in his officlal capacity as Georgia State Uhiversity Associate Provost for Information Systems and Technology; NANCY SEAMANS, in her officlal capacity as Dean of Libraries at Georgia State University, ROBERT F. HATCHER, in his offlcial capacity as Vice Chair of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia; KENNETH R. BERNARD, JR., JAMES A BISHOP, FREDERICK E. COOPER, LARRY R. ELLIS, FELTON JENKINS, W. MANSFIELD JENNINGS, JR., JAMES R. JOLLY, DONALD M. LEEBERN, JR., WILLIAM NESMITH, JR., DOREEN STILES POITEVINT, WILLIS J. POTTS, JR., WANDA YANCEY RODWELL, KESSEL STELLING, JR., BENJAMIN J. TARBUTTON, III, RICHARD L. TUCKER, ALLAN VIGIL, and LARRY WALKER, in their official capacities as members of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia Defendants. ORDER This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Early Pretrial Conference [Doc. 268). Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED. 2011 Scheduling Order, As the
ordered by this Court in its March 3,
parties are directed to file a pre-trial order with this Court by April 29, 201l. SO ORDERED, this ~ day of April, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.