Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 279

ORDER that the Judge has signed the 278 Proposed Pretrial Order. The Court notes that both parties shall file separate findings of fact and conclusions of law. In addition to these findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Court DIRECTS Plaintiffs to file a verbatim statement of the injunctive order they seek in this case no later than May 11, 2011. Plaintiffs may state several alternative versions if they wish to do so. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 5/2/2011. (ank)

Download PDF
FILED IN CHAM U.S.D.C. - Atlanta IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS; OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC.; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. By: NAY 022011 Ja~~~...l;iattQn, CltrII rrrn U &'-~ ~ Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1: 08-CV-1425-0DE v. MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as President of Georgia State University; RISA PALM, in her official capacity as Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost of Georgia State University; J.L. ALBERT, in his official ca~acity as Georgia State Unlverslty Assoclate Provost for Information Systems and Technology; NANCY SEAMANS, in her officlal capacity as Dean of Libraries at Georgia State University; ROBERT F. HATCHER, in his official capacity as Vice Chair of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia; KENNETH R. BERNARD, JR., JAMES A BISHOP, FREDERICK E. COOPER, LARRY R. ELLIS, FELTON JENKINS, W. MANSFIELD JENNINGS, JR., JAMES R. JOLLY, DONALD M. LEEBERN, JR., WILLIAM NESMITH, JR., DOREEN STILES POITEVINT, WILLIS J. POTTS, JR., WANDA YANCEY RODWELL, KESSEL STELLING, JR., BENJAMIN J. TARBUTTON, III, RICHARD L. TUCKER, ALLAN VIGIL, and LARRY WALKER, in their official capacities as members of the Boara of Regents of the University System of Georgia Defendants. ORDER This civil case is before the Court on a joint submission of a Proposed Consolidated Pretrial Order [Doc. 278]. Having reviewed the Proposed Order, the Court notes that the undersigned has signed the Proposed Consolidated Pretrial Order [Doc. 278]. Particular attention is called to the fact that under Local Rule 16.4(B) (29), "[a]ny attempt to reserve a right to amend or add to any part of the pretrial order after the pretrial order has been filed shall be invalid and of no effect and shall not be binding upon any party or the court, unless specifically authorized in writing by the court." The Court notes that both parties shall file separate findings of fact and conclusions of law. In addition to these findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Court DIRECTS Plaintiffs to file a verbatim statement of the injunctive order they seek in this case no later than May 11, 2011. Plaintiffs may state several alternative versions if they wish to do so. SO ORDERED, this ~ day of May, 2011. UL.-v. ORINDA D. EVANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2